-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GH-39327: [Java] define assemble descriptor for new custom maven plugin project #39331
Conversation
@github-actions crossbow submit java |
|
@github-actions crossbow submit java-jars |
Revision: 59c95c4 Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-a241771615
|
Co-authored-by: Sutou Kouhei <[email protected]>
Could you please help me retry Build C++ libraries Ubuntu aarch64? @lidavidm / @kou Current error:
|
Retried! |
Well, there will be an issue with Build C++ libraries in Ubuntu aarch64. Is there any issue related to that? |
…en module project
@github-actions crossbow submit java-jars |
Exclude failing tests to test the PR's scope |
Revision: 8d7c6bc Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-4b8dd60adf
|
|
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ if [ "${ARROW_BUILD_TESTS}" = "ON" ]; then | |||
# ImportError: ../grpc/_cython/cygrpc.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so: | |||
# undefined symbol: vtable for std::__cxx11::basic_ostringstream< | |||
# char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > | |||
exclude_tests="${exclude_tests}|arrow-gcsfs-test" | |||
exclude_tests="${exclude_tests}|arrow-gcsfs-test|arrow-dataset-dataset-writer-test" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: can you link the GitHub issue explaining why we are skipping this test?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is a temporary workaround that only applies to testing this PR's scope. I think we should wait until #39326 is resolved. Please let me know if this sound great for you, or, do we should push this PR with this exclude test to main branch?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are we sure #39326 will be resolved in time?
@github-actions crossbow submit java-jars |
Revision: 60949fa Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-0754aae5ab
|
@github-actions crossbow submit java-jar |
|
@github-actions crossbow submit java-jars |
Revision: 17bafae Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-b3464c02d1
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1
I can't review whether this approach is optimal or not but CI is green.
After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 5 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 6b32b6d. There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉 The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 2 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them. |
…n plugin project (apache#39331) ### Rationale for this change To closes apache#39327 ### What changes are included in this PR? GitHub CI validation needs to [run](https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/main/ci/scripts/java_full_build.sh#L52) `assembly:single` for that reason is needed to setup a descriptor ref. In the case of this maven plugin, I only propose to include "src" as part of the resources. ### Are these changes tested? Yes, by ```` mvn clean \ install \ assembly:single \ source:jar \ javadoc:jar \ -Papache-release \ -DdescriptorId=source-release ```` ### Are there any user-facing changes? No. * Closes: apache#39327 Lead-authored-by: david dali susanibar arce <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Sutou Kouhei <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Li <[email protected]>
…n plugin project (apache#39331) ### Rationale for this change To closes apache#39327 ### What changes are included in this PR? GitHub CI validation needs to [run](https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/main/ci/scripts/java_full_build.sh#L52) `assembly:single` for that reason is needed to setup a descriptor ref. In the case of this maven plugin, I only propose to include "src" as part of the resources. ### Are these changes tested? Yes, by ```` mvn clean \ install \ assembly:single \ source:jar \ javadoc:jar \ -Papache-release \ -DdescriptorId=source-release ```` ### Are there any user-facing changes? No. * Closes: apache#39327 Lead-authored-by: david dali susanibar arce <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Sutou Kouhei <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Li <[email protected]>
…n plugin project (apache#39331) ### Rationale for this change To closes apache#39327 ### What changes are included in this PR? GitHub CI validation needs to [run](https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/main/ci/scripts/java_full_build.sh#L52) `assembly:single` for that reason is needed to setup a descriptor ref. In the case of this maven plugin, I only propose to include "src" as part of the resources. ### Are these changes tested? Yes, by ```` mvn clean \ install \ assembly:single \ source:jar \ javadoc:jar \ -Papache-release \ -DdescriptorId=source-release ```` ### Are there any user-facing changes? No. * Closes: apache#39327 Lead-authored-by: david dali susanibar arce <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Sutou Kouhei <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Li <[email protected]>
Rationale for this change
To closes #39327
What changes are included in this PR?
GitHub CI validation needs to run
assembly:single
for that reason is needed to setup a descriptor ref. In the case of this maven plugin, I only propose to include "src" as part of the resources.Are these changes tested?
Yes, by
Are there any user-facing changes?
No.