Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature pass dictionary configuration in application_file in SparkKubernetesOperator #35848

Conversation

romsharon98
Copy link
Contributor

@romsharon98 romsharon98 commented Nov 25, 2023

continue: #34996
while cherry picking commit for keeping the credit to the original author.


^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

@romsharon98 romsharon98 force-pushed the feature/spark-kubernetes-operator-application-file branch from faf0892 to 264eb58 Compare November 25, 2023 08:58
@romsharon98 romsharon98 changed the title Feature/spark kubernetes operator application file Feature pass dictionary configuration in application_file in SparkKubernetesOperator Nov 25, 2023
xs2tarunkukreja and others added 5 commits November 25, 2023 11:59
As per documentation, it should also accept YAML and JSON directly. The operator is working fine when we pass the file path. But fails when we pass the YAML or JSON as dictionary.
As per documentation, it should also accept YAML and JSON directly. The operator is working fine when we pass the file path. But fails when we pass the YAML or JSON as dictionary.
As per documentation, it should also accept YAML and JSON directly. The operator is working fine when we pass the file path. But fails when we pass the YAML or JSON as dictionary.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area:providers provider:cncf-kubernetes Kubernetes provider related issues
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants