Skip to content

Add copy of Gemini ToolConfig in local #1457

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 27, 2025

Conversation

kumaranvpl
Copy link
Collaborator

Why are these changes needed?

Related issue number

Checks

Copy link
Collaborator

@marklysze marklysze left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @kumaranvpl!

@marklysze marklysze merged commit 81a23ab into llmtoolchoice Mar 27, 2025
13 checks passed
@marklysze marklysze deleted the llmtoolchoice-fix-gemini branch March 27, 2025 22:04
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 27, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 52.11268% with 34 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
autogen/oai/gemini_types.py 50.72% 34 Missing ⚠️
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
autogen/oai/gemini.py 15.56% <100.00%> (+0.18%) ⬆️
autogen/oai/gemini_types.py 50.72% <50.72%> (ø)
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

marklysze added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2025
…1450)

* tool_choice parameters

* Together AI parameter

* Documentation

* Gemini ToolConfig declaration

* Change to Any for ToolConfig in Gemini LLMConfig

* Warning added

* Add copy of Gemini ToolConfig in local (#1457)

* Documentation warning added

---------

Co-authored-by: Kumaran Rajendhiran <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants