Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RichText: Documented missing parameters for isEmpty and isEmptyLine #23338

Conversation

javidalkaruzi
Copy link
Contributor

See #22907.

Description

Fixed the JSDoc warnings in file packages/rich-text/src/is-empty.js

6:1 warning Missing JSDoc @param "value.text" declaration jsdoc/require-param
10:0 warning Missing @param "value.text" jsdoc/check-param-names
18:1 warning Missing JSDoc @param "value.text" declaration jsdoc/require-param
18:1 warning Missing JSDoc @param "value.start" declaration jsdoc/require-param
18:1 warning Missing JSDoc @param "value.end" declaration jsdoc/require-param
22:0 warning Missing @param "value.text" jsdoc/check-param-names
22:0 warning Missing @param "value.start" jsdoc/check-param-names
22:0 warning Missing @param "value.end" jsdoc/check-param-names

✖ 8 problems (0 errors, 8 warnings)
0 errors and 4 warnings potentially fixable with the --fix option.

How has this been tested?

npm run lint-js packages/rich-text/src/is-empty.js

Types of changes

Bug fix

Janvo Aldred added 4 commits June 26, 2020 03:41
@javidalkaruzi javidalkaruzi requested a review from ellatrix August 7, 2020 23:45
@skorasaurus skorasaurus added the [Package] Rich text /packages/rich-text label Dec 6, 2020
@etoledom etoledom removed their request for review December 8, 2020 16:35
@gziolo
Copy link
Member

gziolo commented Dec 13, 2020

Thank you @javidalkaruzi for your contribution. It looks like those issues were resolved in different PR. I'm closing this one.

@gziolo gziolo closed this Dec 13, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
[Package] Rich text /packages/rich-text
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants