Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Text fix in BinaryEncoding #670

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 22, 2016
Merged

Text fix in BinaryEncoding #670

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 22, 2016

Conversation

kripken
Copy link
Member

@kripken kripken commented Apr 22, 2016

Two lines seem to be in the wrong order. The br_table comment talks about the table below it, so the if-else statement should mind its own business.

@rossberg
Copy link
Member

lgtm. Might have been a merge fail?

@kripken kripken merged commit 7d9d0be into binary_0xb Apr 22, 2016
@kripken
Copy link
Member Author

kripken commented Apr 22, 2016

Yeah, looks like a merge fail.

@kripken kripken deleted the textfix branch April 22, 2016 16:01
lukewagner added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2016
* Merge pull request #648 from WebAssembly/current_memory

Add current_memory operator

* Reorder section size field (#639)

* Prettify section names (#638)

* Extensible encoding of function signatures (#640)

* Prettify section names

* Restructure encoding of function signatures

* Revert "[Binary 11] Update the version number to 0xB."

* Leave index space for growing the number of base types

* Comments addressed

* clarify how export/import names convert to JS strings (#569) (#573)

* When embedded in the web, clarify how export/import names convert to JS strings (#569)

* Fixes suggested by @jf

* Address more feedback

Added a link to http://monsur.hossa.in/2012/07/20/utf-8-in-javascript.html.  Simplified the decoding algorithm thanks to Luke's feedback.

* Access to proprietary APIs apart from HTML5 (#656)

* comments

* Merge pull request #641 from WebAssembly/postorder_opcodes

Postorder opcodes

* fix some text that seems to be in the wrong order (#670)

* Clarify that br_table has a branch argument (#664)

* Add explicit argument counts (#672)

* Add explicit arities

* Rename

* Replace uint8 with varint7 in form field (#662)

This needs to be variable-length.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants