-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 695
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Prettify section names #638
Conversation
|
||
### Indirect Function Table section | ||
### Indirection section |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How about "table"?
"Type": Are there plans to use this section for types other than function types? If not, "types" is over-general and confusing, and leaving it as "Signatures" would be better. "Function": How about "Declaration"? "Code", "Data": I prefer "Function Bodies" and "Data Segments". Characters are cheap in this context, and being more descriptive helps newcomers as well as people who have focuses besides the wasm binary format. |
I'm not sure these strings, whatever their value, will appreciably help anyone stepping through the binary in a hex editor. So I like the terseness (and lower case). |
@sunfishcode, yes, we anticipate other uses of the types section, e.g. consider user-defined struct types in the future. This ties in with #640. "Declarations": hm, not sure, as most other sections declare things, too. Re descriptiveness: agreed with Luke. @lukewagner, changed |
Heh, true; that PR would add an |
@lukewagner, or perhaps we should just use singular for all section ids, like we do in prose? |
True; the 's' isn't really adding a lot of value. |
Changed to singular. |
Any objections landing this? |
lgtm |
* [Names](#names-section) section | ||
* [Export](#export-section) section | ||
* [Start](#start-section) section | ||
* [Code](#code-section) section |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why not text
? ;-)
lgtm |
1 similar comment
lgtm |
* Merge pull request #648 from WebAssembly/current_memory Add current_memory operator * Reorder section size field (#639) * Prettify section names (#638) * Extensible encoding of function signatures (#640) * Prettify section names * Restructure encoding of function signatures * Revert "[Binary 11] Update the version number to 0xB." * Leave index space for growing the number of base types * Comments addressed * clarify how export/import names convert to JS strings (#569) (#573) * When embedded in the web, clarify how export/import names convert to JS strings (#569) * Fixes suggested by @jf * Address more feedback Added a link to http://monsur.hossa.in/2012/07/20/utf-8-in-javascript.html. Simplified the decoding algorithm thanks to Luke's feedback. * Access to proprietary APIs apart from HTML5 (#656) * comments * Merge pull request #641 from WebAssembly/postorder_opcodes Postorder opcodes * fix some text that seems to be in the wrong order (#670) * Clarify that br_table has a branch argument (#664) * Add explicit argument counts (#672) * Add explicit arities * Rename * Replace uint8 with varint7 in form field (#662) This needs to be variable-length.
[Retargeted #635 to 0xB branch.]
As suggested in #623. Better suggestions for some of the names are welcome.