-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Static analysis tool providers from Prospector Project #866
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7136ce8
Add more tests for Has Executbale Binaries
sourabhsparkala e37f9b0
Static analysis tool providers from Prospector Project
sourabhsparkala 337f3d8
Dataprovider update to fix Pre commit hook config
sourabhsparkala 1b03dec
Add test content search for Has Binaries provider
sourabhsparkala 1ddab7d
Implement MyPy data provider
sourabhsparkala 5a2a748
Fixing the compilation issues
sourabhsparkala d66a663
Implement the score for pylint, mypy
sourabhsparkala 5e17df0
Address the unknown condition
sourabhsparkala 2b1f3e8
Fix script tests
sourabhsparkala e305dc3
Update lib.sh to fix tests
sourabhsparkala 6956e37
Merge branch 'master' into issue_730
sourabhsparkala c0c8ec4
Update src/main/java/com/sap/oss/phosphor/fosstars/data/AbstractStati…
sourabhsparkala File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
388 changes: 375 additions & 13 deletions
388
src/main/java/com/sap/oss/phosphor/fosstars/data/AbstractStaticScanToolsDataProvider.java
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
25 changes: 0 additions & 25 deletions
25
src/main/java/com/sap/oss/phosphor/fosstars/data/StaticAnalysisScanTool.java
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Isn't it nice to keep this and use it in line 38 and 40 rather than creating Pattern twice.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is a slight difference in these regular patterns, the key to search for in the step and then matching the value of the key. But again you are right about the redundancy, i did not find a better way to integrate one predicate and check for everything.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ManjunathMS35 lets fix this here #873 ?