-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 154
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Windows 20H2 images #523
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @vboulineau,
I looked over the PR and found a few things to note, so here they are.
Thanks for the contribution!
@@ -3,4 +3,4 @@ | |||
|
|||
# Dummy docker image to trigger dependabot PRs | |||
|
|||
FROM mcr.microsoft.com/windows/nanoserver:2004 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I feel like nano 2k4 should be kept for LTS, and only introduce this new version in stable and preview channels, since it is new. Even if the LTS supports it, it seems like its a bit late in the LTS lifespan to introduce a new OS version now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This change is fine, as long as 2004 image is not deleted
@@ -14,6 +14,9 @@ | |||
}, | |||
{ | |||
"Tag": "2004" | |||
}, | |||
{ | |||
"Tag": "20H2" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same here, this is servicing. We should not have it here 100%, but maybe for LTS if @TravisEz13 agrees.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Works for me, removed for servicing. Pending review for LTS.
ef9e32f
to
8f1ed11
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pending test run
@@ -3,4 +3,4 @@ | |||
|
|||
# Dummy docker image to trigger dependabot PRs | |||
|
|||
FROM mcr.microsoft.com/windows/nanoserver:2004 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This change is fine, as long as 2004 image is not deleted
/azp list |
CI/CD Pipelines for this repository: |
/azp run docker-ACR-CI |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
@PoshChan Please remind me in 1 hour |
@TravisEz13, this is the reminder you requested 1 hour ago |
@TravisEz13 we still have a chance of getting this today? |
The build is currently failing so no. |
Hello @RDIL @TravisEz13, the failure seems to be due to |
That's not good! I guess we have to wait for Azure then 😢 |
Ping on this one - would be great to get this soon |
Hey, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Requested changes are fixed now
Not complaining, just asking :) It's important for many who follow the SAC releases closely to have "all the things" follow along as well! |
We cannot release until az acr can build 20h2. I'll try again today. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Gentle ping on this PR |
@aravindhp Still waiting on ACR. No current ETA. |
The following issue has been filed with ACR to track this: Azure/acr#532 |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @vboulineau, I added IsBroken
tags so we can get this in even though we can't publish these to ACR til we have resolution from that side. If you could pull in changes from upstream master (as your branch is 8 commits behind PowerShell:master) we should be good to merge I believe.
694b540
to
ef72ef2
Compare
Signed-off-by: Vincent Boulineau <[email protected]>
ef72ef2
to
3569e7d
Compare
Done, I guess it will require to manually remove the |
/azp run docker-ACR-CI |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
@PoshChan Please remind me in 1 hour |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
built the images again to test and check and all looks good to me. Tests look good too.
@TravisEz13, this is the reminder you requested 1 hour ago |
Yes, I'll come back and make those changes to the metadata when support is finally available. Thank you again for the contribution and patience as we figured this out :) |
@anamnavi can we have an issue to follow for when 20H2 support is finally available? |
sure @donny-dont. Here's the issue: #552 |
I also added a known issue to the wiki.
|
PR Summary
Add images based on Windows 20H2 images.
PR Checklist
Dockerfile
,.sh
,.ps1
and.psm1
files have the correct copyright headerWIP:
to the beginning of the title and remove the prefix when the PR is ready.