Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bugfix release V0.20.2 #203

Closed
wants to merge 15 commits into from
Closed

Bugfix release V0.20.2 #203

wants to merge 15 commits into from

Conversation

mlxd
Copy link
Member

@mlxd mlxd commented Jan 5, 2022

Context: This PR fixes a bug observed with the adjoint Jacobian method and a missing explicit kernel, where a decomposition was not performed.

Description of the Change: An explicit kernel for the CY gate is added.

Benefits: Fixes an issue when using the CY gate as part of the IsingYY operator with the adjoint method.

Possible Drawbacks: None

Related GitHub Issues:

maliasadi and others added 13 commits December 9, 2021 11:05
* Replace complex128 by complex64

* Update

* Update test_apply.py

* Add C64 support to adjoint_jacobian

* Update _serialize

* Add Complex64 full support

* Update

* Update test_comparison

* Update formatting

* Update vjp tests

* Update test_comparison

* Update CHANGELOG

Co-authored-by: antalszava <[email protected]>
* Update test_serialize

* Fix failed tests

* Update CHANGELOG
* Add np.complex64 support in PL-Lightning (#177)

* Replace complex128 by complex64

* Update

* Update test_apply.py

* Add C64 support to adjoint_jacobian

* Update _serialize

* Add Complex64 full support

* Update

* Update test_comparison

* Update formatting

* Update vjp tests

* Update test_comparison

* Update CHANGELOG

Co-authored-by: antalszava <[email protected]>

* Update header.html

* Add algorithm header

Co-authored-by: antalszava <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Josh Izaac <[email protected]>
@mlxd
Copy link
Member Author

mlxd commented Jan 5, 2022

NOTE: do not update this branch against master!

@mlxd mlxd changed the base branch from master to v0.20.1-master January 5, 2022 10:36
@mlxd mlxd requested review from chaeyeunpark and a team January 5, 2022 10:38
Copy link
Member

@maliasadi maliasadi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks good. Thanks @mlxd!

@mlxd mlxd changed the base branch from v0.20.1-master to master January 6, 2022 12:54
@mlxd mlxd changed the base branch from master to v0.20.0-rc0 January 6, 2022 12:55
@mlxd mlxd closed this Jan 7, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants