You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Adding satwinds from the Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) from SNPP/NOAA-20 to GDASApp end-to-end testing
new files include:
parm/atm/obs/config/satwind_viirs_npp.yaml.j2: QC filter YAML for VIIRS SNPP satwinds (jinja2 standard)
parm/atm/obs/config/satwind_viirs_n20.yaml.j2: QC filter YAML for VIIRS NOAA-20 satwinds (jinja2 standard)
parm/ioda/bufr2ioda/bufr2ioda_satwind_amv_viirs.json: JSON containing data format, sensor, and satellite information for VIIRS SNPP/NOAA-20 satwinds
ush/ioda/bufr2ioda/bufr2ioda_satwind_amv_viirs.py: bufr2ioda code for extracting VIIRS SNPP/NOAA-20 satwinds from BUFR
End-to-End Test Results
VIIRS satwinds consist of (LW)IR (type=260) from SNPP and NOAA-20 satellites that are tanked and dumped into BUFR subset NC005091. No thinning is applied to these tests in either GSI or JEDI by regular convention.
SNPP LW(IR) Satwinds (type=260, subtype=224)
There are 39240 SNPP VIIRS LW(IR) satwinds in the UFO test dataset and 39236 in the GSI. The outstanding 4 satwinds that appear in the UFO diag file but not in the GSI diag file are all at pressures less than 125 hPa and are rejected by a pressure-check filter. There are no VIIRS observations at pressures less than 125 hPa in the GSI diag file. There are 27529 satwinds assimilated in JEDI and 27560 in GSI, a difference of roughly 0.1%.
Accepted observations are distributed similarly between GSI and JEDI:
The windEastward and windNorthward values, their HofX values, and the OmB look good comparing GSI and JEDI:
Overall error comparisons between JEDI and GSI look good - there are a few outstanding differences where GSI assigns a higher error to an observation than JEDI, but these are infrequent and are likely due to differences in duplicate error inflation since GSI is processing all AMVs on a single processor and can identify duplicates across types while JEDI processes types on separate processors and the cross-type duplicates are invisible.
plan map distribution:
vertical profile:
NOAA-20 LW(IR) Satwinds (type=260, subtype=225)
There are 44849 NOAA-20 VIIRS LW(IR) satwinds in the UFO test dataset and 44847 in the GSI. The outstanding 2 satwinds that appear in the UFO diag file but not in the GSI diag file are all at pressures less than 125 hPa and are rejected by a pressure-check filter. There are no VIIRS observations at pressures less than 125 hPa in the GSI diag file. There are 31839 satwinds assimilated in JEDI and 31863 in GSI, a difference of roughly 0.07%.
Accepted observations are distributed similarly between GSI and JEDI:
The windEastward and windNorthward values, their HofX values, and the OmB look good comparing GSI and JEDI:
Overall error comparisons between JEDI and GSI look good - there are a few outstanding differences where GSI assigns a higher error to an observation than JEDI, but these are infrequent and are likely due to differences in duplicate error inflation since GSI is processing all AMVs on a single processor and can identify duplicates across types while JEDI processes types on separate processors and the cross-type duplicates are invisible.
plan map distribution:
vertical profile:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Adding satwinds from the Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite
(VIIRS) from SNPP/NOAA-20 to GDASApp end-to-end testing
new files include:
parm/atm/obs/config/satwind_viirs_npp.yaml.j2: QC filter YAML for VIIRS
SNPP satwinds (jinja2 standard)
parm/atm/obs/config/satwind_viirs_n20.yaml.j2: QC filter YAML for VIIRS
NOAA-20 satwinds (jinja2 standard)
parm/ioda/bufr2ioda/bufr2ioda_satwind_amv_viirs.json: JSON containing
data format, sensor, and satellite information for VIIRS SNPP/NOAA-20
satwinds
ush/ioda/bufr2ioda/bufr2ioda_satwind_amv_viirs.py: bufr2ioda code for
extracting VIIRS SNPP/NOAA-20 satwinds from BUFR
See #1054 for end-to-end testing results. Acceptance and ob-errors agree
well with some expected deviation. No thinning is applied to these winds
by regular convention.
Note: We are still using `qualityInformationWithoutForecast` as the
variable-name for QI in the IODA converter. This variable-name is
currently not registered in the IODA ObsSpace.yaml, but there is an
ongoing discussion with JCSDA to have it added, issue is here:
JCSDA-internal/ioda#1233
Co-authored-by: Brett Hoover <[email protected]>
Adding satwinds from the Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) from SNPP/NOAA-20 to GDASApp end-to-end testing
new files include:
parm/atm/obs/config/satwind_viirs_npp.yaml.j2: QC filter YAML for VIIRS SNPP satwinds (jinja2 standard)
parm/atm/obs/config/satwind_viirs_n20.yaml.j2: QC filter YAML for VIIRS NOAA-20 satwinds (jinja2 standard)
parm/ioda/bufr2ioda/bufr2ioda_satwind_amv_viirs.json: JSON containing data format, sensor, and satellite information for VIIRS SNPP/NOAA-20 satwinds
ush/ioda/bufr2ioda/bufr2ioda_satwind_amv_viirs.py: bufr2ioda code for extracting VIIRS SNPP/NOAA-20 satwinds from BUFR
End-to-End Test Results
VIIRS satwinds consist of (LW)IR (type=260) from SNPP and NOAA-20 satellites that are tanked and dumped into BUFR subset NC005091. No thinning is applied to these tests in either GSI or JEDI by regular convention.
SNPP LW(IR) Satwinds (type=260, subtype=224)
There are 39240 SNPP VIIRS LW(IR) satwinds in the UFO test dataset and 39236 in the GSI. The outstanding 4 satwinds that appear in the UFO diag file but not in the GSI diag file are all at pressures less than 125 hPa and are rejected by a pressure-check filter. There are no VIIRS observations at pressures less than 125 hPa in the GSI diag file. There are 27529 satwinds assimilated in JEDI and 27560 in GSI, a difference of roughly 0.1%.
Accepted observations are distributed similarly between GSI and JEDI:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac0f3/ac0f3c166beaaef072414d27a41220a8b66805ce" alt="image"
The
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15f61/15f61ace07225e07f77d1d2a76db5a897a20a3af" alt="image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a840/9a8404bdaefd5efb2a9b7d455d74c011ad46db72" alt="image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/763e2/763e2164155258dd27a98064e5ddb53b0b8a105e" alt="image"
windEastward
andwindNorthward
values, their HofX values, and the OmB look good comparing GSI and JEDI:Overall error comparisons between JEDI and GSI look good - there are a few outstanding differences where GSI assigns a higher error to an observation than JEDI, but these are infrequent and are likely due to differences in duplicate error inflation since GSI is processing all AMVs on a single processor and can identify duplicates across types while JEDI processes types on separate processors and the cross-type duplicates are invisible.
plan map distribution:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf6b3/cf6b3b3adee96d6f25ab038dacf45da661583f6e" alt="image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01937/01937be331d173e0ea598577dba1277c56e6a205" alt="image"
vertical profile:
NOAA-20 LW(IR) Satwinds (type=260, subtype=225)
There are 44849 NOAA-20 VIIRS LW(IR) satwinds in the UFO test dataset and 44847 in the GSI. The outstanding 2 satwinds that appear in the UFO diag file but not in the GSI diag file are all at pressures less than 125 hPa and are rejected by a pressure-check filter. There are no VIIRS observations at pressures less than 125 hPa in the GSI diag file. There are 31839 satwinds assimilated in JEDI and 31863 in GSI, a difference of roughly 0.07%.
Accepted observations are distributed similarly between GSI and JEDI:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/994ba/994baf2d091d258854d5e6d924fcf356fa6b6dd3" alt="image"
The
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0185c/0185cce988ee31be8260f82eda91610ffcd0725c" alt="image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ade6c/ade6cef247c71254016d8477f8fe9ad505266d9f" alt="image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0222/d0222f12d67f283562484bcaf3d0bb33f6cdbb69" alt="image"
windEastward
andwindNorthward
values, their HofX values, and the OmB look good comparing GSI and JEDI:Overall error comparisons between JEDI and GSI look good - there are a few outstanding differences where GSI assigns a higher error to an observation than JEDI, but these are infrequent and are likely due to differences in duplicate error inflation since GSI is processing all AMVs on a single processor and can identify duplicates across types while JEDI processes types on separate processors and the cross-type duplicates are invisible.
plan map distribution:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2b7c6/2b7c69b8e3583ed14cb9d95c207a79a14f1d1ac2" alt="image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6ef0/f6ef0302960ceb3c513ee4a54d24da88b14c4cfb" alt="image"
vertical profile:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: