CCPP Framework Meeting Minutes 2024 07 11

Agenda

• GitHub issues/PRs
• New items
• Updates
• Other business
• notes

---

Attendees: Mike Kavulich,

GitHub issues/PRs

CCPP Framework (issues, PRs, discussions)

• Constituent updates PR#549

  • Merged! 🎉 🥳

• Remove requirement that suite definition file names begin with "suite_" PR#569

  • PRs are open for SCM and UFS weather model/FV3, but progress is ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
    • Will this need a separate PR for develop branch, or are we okay with cherry-picking?

• Need mechanism to support equivalent units Issue#570

  • DRAFT TO DISCUSS: Add support and testing for equivalent units #571

• Add new "register" phase #572

• Implement new constituent property/field to track "above the top of model" values #573

• Standardize ordering of ccpp_error_code and ccpp_error_message Issue#574

Standard names (issues, PRs, discussions)

• Nothing new

New items for discussion

• (NCAR SEs) Remind us what the rules are for reading in data from files within a physics scheme?
• (NCAR SEs) "develop" will be name of development branch
  • reminder that we landed on "YYYY-MM-DD" and "YYYY-MM-DD-dev" for tag naming convention

Updates from last time

Previous notes

Other business

• Draft for "Development Workflow" wiki page here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iMh_iKsUrB_mOMF6lGkFggG85JV62NFkTjKJboqWvV8/edit Please offer comments/suggestions!

Meeting notes

CCPP Framework

• #569: “suite_” requirement
  • Waiting on code managers to make up their minds about this
  • Will plan to target new develop branch
• #570 & #571 - equivalent units
  • Needs a prebuild change
  • Will re-target to development branch
• Courtney working on register phase
• #573 - above the top of model constituent values
  • Some things need multiple layers above the model top
    • CGD SEs to consider this in the design
  • Semi-low priority from CGD’s side
• #574 - will target “errmsg, errcode”

Standard Names

• nothing new

Discussion

• Rules for reading in data files within a physics scheme?
  • Can read in data during scheme (including netcdf files) - except for run phase
• “develop” will be the name of the new branch
  • Michael K has rough draft for development workflow; ready for comments and suggestions
  • CGD will make a dev tag off of develop
  • Dom added branch protections for develop