Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue #65 - Fix git hooks install on non-checkout version of repo #88

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 18, 2018

Conversation

MJJoyce
Copy link
Member

@MJJoyce MJJoyce commented Jun 6, 2018

Git hook install now checks to make sure that the .git/hooks directory
exists before attempting to copy the hook script into location. This
ensures no error shows up when installing from a non-cloned version of
the code base.

Remove the git hook install from non-develop mode installs. If someone
is installing the toolkit in 'install' mode instead of 'develop' mode
the likelihood of them making changes that the hook would catch seems
slim.

Update the packaging naming in the git hook

Resolve #65

@MJJoyce MJJoyce requested review from a team as code owners June 6, 2018 23:55
Git hook install now checks to make sure that the .git/hooks directory
exists before attempting to copy the hook script into location. This
ensures no error shows up when installing from a non-cloned version of
the code base.

Remove the git hook install from non-develop mode installs. If someone
is installing the toolkit in 'install' mode instead of 'develop' mode
the likelihood of them making changes that the hook would catch seems
slim.

Update the packaging naming in the git hook
@MJJoyce MJJoyce merged commit 355844a into master Jun 18, 2018
@MJJoyce MJJoyce deleted the issue-65 branch June 18, 2018 18:54
Mejiro-McQueen referenced this pull request in Mejiro-McQueen/Bifrost Feb 9, 2023
Fix typo in SLE config; update RCF script for new config format (#87)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant