Upgrade to fog-google 1.5.0

[tumido]

Upgrade to fog-google >= 1.5.0:

• Uses upstream fix for Hotfix: remove google-containers images listing #63
• Remove workaround for fixed subnet listing, fixed in upstream Listing all subnetworks symbol key fog/fog-google#321
• Fix health check state

This PR could be used instead of #63

Fixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1591272

[tumido]

@miq-bot add_label refactoring, inventory

[miq-bot]

Checked commits tumido/manageiq-providers-google@875001a~...af27946 with ruby 2.3.3, rubocop 0.52.1, haml-lint 0.20.0, and yamllint 1.10.0
2 files checked, 0 offenses detected
Everything looks fine. 👍

[chrispy1]

@miq-bot add_label blocker

[simaishi]

Gaprindashvili backport details:

$ git log -1
commit 622fbf20352f93e1fc14264d4a6c18481a65cba4
Author: Bronagh Sorota <[email protected]>
Date:   Mon Jun 18 10:16:27 2018 -0400

    Merge pull request #64 from tumido/fog-1.5.0
    
    Upgrade to fog-google 1.5.0
    (cherry picked from commit ba0968c09332b35445d4115a514c461f0ef52702)
    
    Fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1592504

[tumido]

@miq-bot add_label fine/yes

as recommended in BUG 1596336

[simaishi]

@tumido Does this PR require #54?

As is, I will only backport this PR as this PR doesn't list dependencies and #54 doesn't fix a blocker BZ. But that will backport #54 partially, so I just want to make sure that won't cause a problem.

[tumido]

Hi @simaishi! I'm afraid it does. In the time this PR was opened, the #54 was already in master, therefore it's not listed as dependency. The #54 has to be backported to fix the issue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1592216 and it's duplicates. So backporting both is the key probably (both are labeled fine/yes).

[simaishi]

Marking as fine/conflict as the dependent PR #54 conflicts on cherry-pick.

[tumido]

@simaishi there will be a conflict on cherry-pick since in Fine there's no manageiq-providers-google.gemspec. This has to be moved into Gemfile. Would you like me to prepare a separate PR?

[simaishi]

@tumido yes, please.

[simaishi]

Backported to Fine via ManageIQ/manageiq#17936