Make rotateExtrude operate in radians

[isovector]

Before, rotateExtrude operated over degrees for compatability reasons
with scad. This is an odd choice for the haskell library itself, so
instead we make rotateExtrude do the right thing, and put a shim into
openscad to make the transformation.

Fixes #288

[julialongtin]

Can we get a test for this?

[isovector]

I'm not sure what a test would look like for this. Any suggestions?

…

On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 4:04 AM Julia Longtin ***@***.***> wrote: Can we get a test for this? — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#299 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AACLAF4VXVZWDYHL3YXUCNLSQ6UETANCNFSM4T5CGT4Q> .

[julialongtin]

Sure. Use the fact that a complete rotation is identical to a un-rotated object as the test, both in scad, and in haskell. On Sat, Nov 21, 2020, 7:09 PM Sandy Maguire <[email protected]> wrote:

…

I'm not sure what a test would look like for this. Any suggestions? On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 4:04 AM Julia Longtin ***@***.***> wrote: > Can we get a test for this? > > — > You are receiving this because you authored the thread. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <#299 (comment)>, > or unsubscribe > < https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AACLAF4VXVZWDYHL3YXUCNLSQ6UETANCNFSM4T5CGT4Q > > . > — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#299 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEAMAAXDARTFKJ27AHL2CQ3SQ764HANCNFSM4T5CGT4Q> .

[isovector]

As far as I can tell, rotateExtrude is hopelessly broken (#307, #308, #309, #310), so I'm not sure these tests will be conclusive.