Update README.md #85
Update README.md #85
Conversation
|
My review is in progress 📖 - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes! |
👋 Hi there!Everything looks good!
|
Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:
Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:
|
|
Warning Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe update primarily involved enhancing the functionality related to reading contents from PDF files by refining the goal statement of the Proof of Concept (POC) and replacing the iTextSharp library with more contemporary options. The main focus was on testing and identifying effective solutions for PDF content extraction without altering any exported or public entity declarations. Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![senior-dev-bot[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/282840?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
|
|
||
| Refer to this article: [Reading a PDF in C# on .NET Core](https://dev.to/eliotjones/reading-a-pdf-in-c-on-net-core-43ef) | ||
|
|
||
| The main goal of this POC is to test the available options we have now to read effectively content from PDF files and replace the current [iTextSharp - for .NET Framework](https://www.nuget.org/packages/iTextSharp). | ||
| The main goal of this POC is to test the available options for effectively reading content from PDF files and replace the current [iTextSharp—for .NET Framework](https://www.nuget.org/packages/iTextSharp). | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
CODE REVIEW
- Hyphenation and Grammar: The updated sentence improves clarity and readability by using a proper hyphen and simplifying the structure.
Here's a suggestion to further improve clarity:
-The main goal of this POC is to test the available options we have now to read effectively content from PDF files and replace the current [iTextSharp - for .NET Framework](https://www.nuget.org/packages/iTextSharp).
+The main goal of this POC is to test the available options for effectively reading PDF content and replace the current [iTextSharp—for .NET Framework](https://www.nuget.org/packages/iTextSharp).This makes the sentence more concise and easier to understand.
|
|
||
| ### ❌ iTextSharp.LGPLv2.Core | ||
|
|
||
| Issues with encoding. | ||
| Encoding issues. | ||
| The simple PDF generated by the library itself can be read, but another PDF tested returns problems with encoding. | ||
|
|
||
| - [SimpleTextExtractionStrategy ?](https://github.com/VahidN/iTextSharp.LGPLv2.Core/issues/7) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
CODE REVIEW
- Improved wording for clarity:
-Issues with encoding.
+Encoding issues.-
Please add a description of encoding issues. This can help in understanding the problem better.
-
The outdated URL format can be updated:
- [SimpleTextExtractionStrategy ?](https://github.com/VahidN/iTextSharp.LGPLv2.Core/issues/7)
+ [SimpleTextExtractionStrategy?](https://github.com/VahidN/iTextSharp.LGPLv2.Core/issues/7)Remember to use bullet points consistently for lists.
Please double-check what I found in the pull request:Issue Counts
Summary of Proposed Changes
Identified Issues
Issue Explanations and FixesIssue 1Type: 📖Readability Fix: -The main goal of this POC is to test the available options we have now to read effectively content from PDF files and replace the current [iTextSharp - for .NET Framework](https://www.nuget.org/packages/iTextSharp).
+The main goal of this POC is to test the available options for effectively reading content from PDF files and replace the current [iTextSharp—for .NET Framework](https://www.nuget.org/packages/iTextSharp).Explanation: The rephrased sentence is clearer and more concise. Issue 2Type: 📖Readability Fix: -Issues with encoding.
+Encoding issues.Explanation: The simplified phrase is clearer and more direct. General ReviewThe proposed changes improve the readability of the README.md file. The rephrased sentences are clearer and more concise, making the document easier to understand. There are no issues related to mistakes, typos, security, performance, or best practices in the proposed changes. The overall code quality and style are good, with a focus on enhancing readability. Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev |
![gstraccini[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/480132?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
![korbit-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/322216?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
|
|
Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked! Scan results: |
Summary by CodeRabbit