Update Magiclysm's enchanted rings armor layers and add a "SKINTIGHT" flag to vanilla rings.

[Marcos6226]

Summary

Bugfixes "Fix Magiclysm obsolete armor layers to match vanilla ones and add a ''SKINTIGHT'' flag to vanilla rings."

Purpose of change

I changed magiclysm's enchanted_rings.json armor layers to better represent the vannila ones.
I also added the "SKINTIGHT" flag to all rings in jewelry.json to partially fix conflicts with gloves.
This PR may close #60058 but I'm not entirely sure.

Describe the solution

I have added the "specifically_covers": [ "hand_fingers_l", "hand_fingers_r" ] line to make it only cover the fingers and not the entire hand. I have also added the missing "SKINTIGHT" flag to the rings so the majority of the gloves can be worn with rings.

Describe alternatives you've considered

Don't add the "SKINTIGHT" flag and find a better solution to deal with rings and gloves.

As a side note, I'm open to any suggestions and ideas.

Testing

I have tested it, and it's working as intended. The vanilla rings have the flag and it's not comflicting with normal layer gloves anymore.
Magiclysm is also working as intended. I have spawned several enchanted rings and they now only cover the fingers, and it's only possible to wear one per hand.
Below are some screenshots to prove it.

Additional context

[bombasticSlacks]

I personally think this is one of those situations where the encumbrance penalty is fine and that they shouldn't be skin tight.

It's not impossible to wear gloves and rings it's just a bit uncomfortable and I would argue that that is true to real life and accurate to what the game represents.

This isn't to dissuade you from contribution and I think other people should weigh in but that's my 2c.

[Marcos6226]

This isn't to dissuade you from contribution and I think other people should weigh in but that's my 2c.

Thank you for sharing your opinion! I also think that the encumbrance penalty is not a huge deal; after all, vanilla rings don't give anything unless you have the stylish trait. Of course, if someone explicitly says to remove it, I'll do it with no problems whatsoever.

If you have any more suggestions, I'm all ears.

[jagoly]

I personally think this is one of those situations where the encumbrance penalty is fine and that they shouldn't be skin tight.

Personally I think the penalty should be more like 0.5 encumbrance, but that's not possible so I think zero would be closer to accurate than the pretty significant penalty of 2 or 3. But I concede that it's probably not worth putting too much effort into making that possible with new flags or something, as the penalty isn't that strange.

I don't understand why you don't think they should be skintight. Who wears rings over gloves IRL? That just sounds strange (and impossible for all but the thinnest gloves).