Skip to content

Migrate RabbitMQ queues in ci-aio #1620

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: stackhpc/master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Migrate RabbitMQ queues in ci-aio #1620

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

MoteHue
Copy link
Contributor

@MoteHue MoteHue commented Apr 23, 2025

No description provided.

@MoteHue MoteHue requested a review from a team as a code owner April 23, 2025 13:24
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added size: s workflows Workflow files have been modified labels Apr 23, 2025
@MoteHue
Copy link
Contributor Author

MoteHue commented Apr 23, 2025

This relies on the following PR: #1619

@MoteHue MoteHue closed this Apr 23, 2025
@MoteHue MoteHue reopened this Apr 23, 2025
Alex-Welsh
Alex-Welsh requested changes Apr 24, 2025
View reviewed changes
@Alex-Welsh
Copy link
Member

@MoteHue you might want to cherry-pick 3d847fa to fix the lint jobs

@Alex-Welsh Alex-Welsh mentioned this pull request Apr 29, 2025
Open
@MoteHue MoteHue force-pushed the epoxy-rabbitmq-queue-migration branch from c83b800 to 7674d51 Compare April 29, 2025 09:56
@MoteHue MoteHue force-pushed the epoxy-rabbitmq-queue-migration branch from 7674d51 to bb7682d Compare April 29, 2025 10:00
@MoteHue MoteHue force-pushed the epoxy-rabbitmq-queue-migration branch from bb7682d to c0d6b00 Compare April 29, 2025 12:37
@MoteHue
Copy link
Contributor Author

MoteHue commented Apr 29, 2025

This needs to merge first: #1629

Alex-Welsh
Alex-Welsh previously approved these changes Apr 29, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@Alex-Welsh Alex-Welsh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM if CI passes

@MoteHue MoteHue closed this Apr 29, 2025
@MoteHue MoteHue reopened this Apr 29, 2025
@Alex-Welsh Alex-Welsh mentioned this pull request Apr 30, 2025
Merged
@MoteHue
Copy link
Contributor Author

MoteHue commented Apr 30, 2025

Error in kayobe image building:

 #11 31.51 Error: 
#11 31.51  Problem: package gcc-11.5.0-5.el9_5.x86_64 from appstream requires glibc-devel >= 2.2.90-12, but none of the providers can be installed
#11 31.51   - conflicting requests
#11 31.51   - nothing provides glibc = 2.34-125.el9_5.3 needed by glibc-devel-2.34-125.el9_5.3.x86_64 from appstream
#11 31.51   - nothing provides glibc = 2.34-125.el9_5.3 needed by glibc-devel-2.34-125.el9_5.3.i686 from appstream
#11 31.51 (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages)

@Alex-Welsh Alex-Welsh force-pushed the epoxy-rabbitmq-queue-migration branch from 066b277 to 3fdb4f2 Compare April 30, 2025 15:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@Alex-Welsh Alex-Welsh Alex-Welsh left review comments

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
size: s workflows Workflow files have been modified
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@MoteHue @Alex-Welsh