Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - chore: remove unnecessary @[eqns] attributes #11460

Closed
wants to merge 12 commits into from

Conversation

kim-em
Copy link
Contributor

@kim-em kim-em commented Mar 17, 2024

These attributes are unused in Mathlib.

Many of them were workarounds for the now-resolved leanprover/lean4#2243; this also allows the lemmas themselves (hasFiniteIntegral_def, integrable_def, memℒp_def, and integrableOn_def) to be deleted.

We are currently experiencing problems with the @[eqns] attribute on the Lean nightlies. I'm uncertain yet what the outcome is going to be there, but it seems prudent to reduce our unnecessary exposure to a language feature added in Mathlib.

@kmill
Copy link
Contributor

kmill commented Mar 25, 2024

bors d+

@mathlib-bors
Copy link
Contributor

mathlib-bors bot commented Mar 25, 2024

✌️ semorrison can now approve this pull request. To approve and merge a pull request, simply reply with bors r+. More detailed instructions are available here.

@kim-em
Copy link
Contributor Author

kim-em commented Mar 25, 2024

bors merge

@github-actions github-actions bot added the ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors. label Mar 25, 2024
mathlib-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2024
These attributes are unused in Mathlib.

Many of them were workarounds for the now-resolved leanprover/lean4#2243; this also allows the lemmas themselves (`hasFiniteIntegral_def`, `integrable_def`, `memℒp_def`, and `integrableOn_def`) to be deleted.

We are currently experiencing problems with the `@[eqns]` attribute on the Lean nightlies. I'm uncertain yet what the outcome is going to be there, but it seems prudent to reduce our unnecessary exposure to a language feature added in Mathlib.

Co-authored-by: Scott Morrison <[email protected]>
@mathlib-bors
Copy link
Contributor

mathlib-bors bot commented Mar 25, 2024

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot changed the title chore: remove unnecessary @[eqns] attributes [Merged by Bors] - chore: remove unnecessary @[eqns] attributes Mar 25, 2024
@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot closed this Mar 25, 2024
@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot deleted the rm_unnecessary_eqns_attributes branch March 25, 2024 01:41
Louddy pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2024
These attributes are unused in Mathlib.

Many of them were workarounds for the now-resolved leanprover/lean4#2243; this also allows the lemmas themselves (`hasFiniteIntegral_def`, `integrable_def`, `memℒp_def`, and `integrableOn_def`) to be deleted.

We are currently experiencing problems with the `@[eqns]` attribute on the Lean nightlies. I'm uncertain yet what the outcome is going to be there, but it seems prudent to reduce our unnecessary exposure to a language feature added in Mathlib.

Co-authored-by: Scott Morrison <[email protected]>
utensil pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2024
These attributes are unused in Mathlib.

Many of them were workarounds for the now-resolved leanprover/lean4#2243; this also allows the lemmas themselves (`hasFiniteIntegral_def`, `integrable_def`, `memℒp_def`, and `integrableOn_def`) to be deleted.

We are currently experiencing problems with the `@[eqns]` attribute on the Lean nightlies. I'm uncertain yet what the outcome is going to be there, but it seems prudent to reduce our unnecessary exposure to a language feature added in Mathlib.

Co-authored-by: Scott Morrison <[email protected]>
Louddy pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2024
These attributes are unused in Mathlib.

Many of them were workarounds for the now-resolved leanprover/lean4#2243; this also allows the lemmas themselves (`hasFiniteIntegral_def`, `integrable_def`, `memℒp_def`, and `integrableOn_def`) to be deleted.

We are currently experiencing problems with the `@[eqns]` attribute on the Lean nightlies. I'm uncertain yet what the outcome is going to be there, but it seems prudent to reduce our unnecessary exposure to a language feature added in Mathlib.

Co-authored-by: Scott Morrison <[email protected]>
atarnoam pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2024
These attributes are unused in Mathlib.

Many of them were workarounds for the now-resolved leanprover/lean4#2243; this also allows the lemmas themselves (`hasFiniteIntegral_def`, `integrable_def`, `memℒp_def`, and `integrableOn_def`) to be deleted.

We are currently experiencing problems with the `@[eqns]` attribute on the Lean nightlies. I'm uncertain yet what the outcome is going to be there, but it seems prudent to reduce our unnecessary exposure to a language feature added in Mathlib.

Co-authored-by: Scott Morrison <[email protected]>
uniwuni pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2024
These attributes are unused in Mathlib.

Many of them were workarounds for the now-resolved leanprover/lean4#2243; this also allows the lemmas themselves (`hasFiniteIntegral_def`, `integrable_def`, `memℒp_def`, and `integrableOn_def`) to be deleted.

We are currently experiencing problems with the `@[eqns]` attribute on the Lean nightlies. I'm uncertain yet what the outcome is going to be there, but it seems prudent to reduce our unnecessary exposure to a language feature added in Mathlib.

Co-authored-by: Scott Morrison <[email protected]>
callesonne pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2024
These attributes are unused in Mathlib.

Many of them were workarounds for the now-resolved leanprover/lean4#2243; this also allows the lemmas themselves (`hasFiniteIntegral_def`, `integrable_def`, `memℒp_def`, and `integrableOn_def`) to be deleted.

We are currently experiencing problems with the `@[eqns]` attribute on the Lean nightlies. I'm uncertain yet what the outcome is going to be there, but it seems prudent to reduce our unnecessary exposure to a language feature added in Mathlib.

Co-authored-by: Scott Morrison <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
delegated ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

an equation lemma with autoParam arguments fails to rewrite
3 participants