Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[v3] Migrating to new ad unit sizes and unifying default banners #195

Closed
limbofeather opened this issue Apr 19, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Comments

@limbofeather
Copy link
Contributor

limbofeather commented Apr 19, 2024

As a part of the v3 update to Zesty's SDK, we will be migrating from wide, square and tall ad unit sizes to their closest IAB formats billboard, medium rectangle and mobile phone interstitial, respectively. We will also be removing the minimal and transparent ad defaults and unifying them into one.

Below is the mapping:

  • wide (1024x256) --> billboard (970x250)
  • square (1024x1024) --> medium rectangle (300x250)
  • tall (768x1024) --> mobile phone interstitial (640x1136 or 750x1334 or 1080x1920)

Migrating

In order to not break existing ad units by pre-emptively removing the older formats, we will place the new ad formats behind a flag so that only specified spatial apps will have the new mapping enabled.

Gradually over a course of one month we will begin to phase out the older formats by lifting the flag so that all spatial apps that use the Zesty SDK by default use the new ad formats.

@limbofeather limbofeather changed the title Remove option to select minimal or transparent ad formats [v3] Migrating to new ad unit sizes and unifying defaults Apr 23, 2024
@limbofeather limbofeather changed the title [v3] Migrating to new ad unit sizes and unifying defaults [v3] Migrating to new ad unit sizes and unifying default banners Apr 23, 2024
@limbofeather limbofeather modified the milestone: V2 Apr 23, 2024
@limbofeather
Copy link
Contributor Author

We'll also need to fully deprecate the tall, wide and square banners.

@limbofeather
Copy link
Contributor Author

Formally closed by #210

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant