-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 144
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Drop json_payload
column.
#1282
Conversation
👍 |
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | |||
ALTER TABLE api_review DROP COLUMN json_payload; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Before we drop this, we should consequently look into our database, whether api_definition
is really filled as expected for the entire review history and merge the content if necessary.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@vadeg I had a first look at the data. It looked actually, as if it is doing what it says and storing the request payload
. For me this is a dumb idea ... however, we will have a gap of 146 rows, that have been called by url
and will afterwards have no pointer to the API reviewed. I will approve as soon as the merge conflict is resolved.
f36c7d7
to
a1161e1
Compare
@tkrop the conflict has been resolved. |
👍 |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1282 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 76.03% 76.02% -0.01%
Complexity 1017 1017
============================================
Files 187 187
Lines 2938 2937 -1
Branches 508 508
============================================
- Hits 2234 2233 -1
Misses 435 435
Partials 269 269
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
@tkrop I have resolved conflicts. Please review again. |
👍 |
Fixes #890