Avoid unnecessary syncs in push-only syncmode #173
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent updates introduce a new condition in the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s) (Beta)sequenceDiagram
participant Client1
participant Client2
participant Document
participant Attachment
Client1->>Document: Make changes
Document->>Attachment: Check syncMode
Attachment->>Document: hasLocalChanges()
Document-->>Attachment: Response
Attachment-->>Client1: Sync if necessary
Client2->>Document: Make changes
Document->>Attachment: Check syncMode
Attachment->>Document: hasLocalChanges()
Document-->>Attachment: Response
Attachment-->>Client2: Sync if necessary
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- Sources/Core/Attachment.swift (1 hunks)
- Tests/Integration/ClientIntegrationTests.swift (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
Sources/Core/Attachment.swift (1)
45-47: Ensure the new condition for.realtimePushOnlyis correctly placed within theneedRealtimeSyncmethod.Verification successful
The new condition for
.realtimePushOnlyis correctly placed within theneedRealtimeSyncmethod. It checks the sync mode and returns the result ofself.doc.hasLocalChanges()without interfering with other conditions.
Sources/Core/Attachment.swift, lines 45-47: The condition for.realtimePushOnlyis logically placed and does not interfere with other conditions.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the placement and logic of the new condition in the `needRealtimeSync` method. # Test: Search for the method implementation. Expect: The new condition should be logically placed and should not interfere with other conditions. ast-grep --lang swift --pattern $'class Attachment { $$$ func needRealtimeSync() { $$$ if syncMode == .realtimePushOnly { return await self.doc.hasLocalChanges() } $$$ } $$$ }'Length of output: 805
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the placement and logic of the new condition in the `needRealtimeSync` method. # Test: Search for the method implementation. Expect: The new condition should be logically placed and should not interfere with other conditions. ast-grep --lang swift --pattern $'func needRealtimeSync() { $$$ if syncMode == .realtimePushOnly { return await self.doc.hasLocalChanges() } $$$ }'Length of output: 160
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the placement and logic of the new condition in the `needRealtimeSync` method within the `Attachment` class. # Test: Search for the `Attachment` class and `needRealtimeSync` method implementation. Expect: The new condition should be logically placed and should not interfere with other conditions. ast-grep --lang swift --pattern $'class Attachment { $$$ func needRealtimeSync() { $$$ if syncMode == .realtimePushOnly { return await self.doc.hasLocalChanges() } $$$ } $$$ }'Length of output: 801
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the placement and logic of the new condition in the `needRealtimeSync` method within the `Attachment` class. # Test: Search for the `needRealtimeSync` method implementation using `rg` and inspect the code for the new condition. rg 'func needRealtimeSync' -A 10Length of output: 669
Tests/Integration/ClientIntegrationTests.swift (1)
684-747: Review the new test function for completeness and correctness.Ensure the test covers all scenarios related to the new sync mode and adheres to best practices for asynchronous testing in Swift.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- Sources/Core/Attachment.swift (1 hunks)
- Tests/Integration/ClientIntegrationTests.swift (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- Sources/Core/Attachment.swift
- Tests/Integration/ClientIntegrationTests.swift
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #173 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 43.01% 42.92% -0.10%
==========================================
Files 106 106
Lines 19252 19295 +43
==========================================
Hits 8282 8282
- Misses 10970 11013 +43 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:
Additional documentation:
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Tests