-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 119
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Top-level “Author” or “Developer” component #244
Comments
My gut instinct is that this information doesn't belong in AppStream -- it's about describing components (i.e. apps) rather than companies or people. I think an ID for a developer would make sense perhaps, but not everything that comes with that, e.g. a photo, company, email address etc. |
Indeed, what @hughsie said. I found myself in need of a developer/author ID multiple times now though, and toyed around with something like this: <creator id="acme_inc">
<name>ACME Inc.</name>
</creator> Reason for this layout is that we need the |
Would that But if a top-level approach doesn’t make sense, we can just implement this ourselves with a JSON server or something, and just rely on the RDNN and/or existing (In case folks browsing here are not familiar, here's an example of a developer page from the Google Play store): |
Well, I think specifying developer info pages is out of scope for AppStream, but as you may have noticed, the |
In AppCenter, we've been discussing adding a developer page (elementary/appcenter#148) where we show some information about a dev like an avatar, website, contact info, etc. and then all of their apps in the store. While we can currently do some string matching between the RDNNs and/or the developer field on individual apps, it doesn't provide a way to get any more information about the developer.
Would it make sense to have a new top-level developer component in AppStream that could be downloaded and cached alongside the apps' metadata, giving distros, app stores, etc. a place to provide more rich information about the developers behind the apps?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: