refactor: move either/flow to common module (#WPB-16073)

[sbakhtiarov]

WPB-16073 [Android] Kalium refactoring

https://wearezeta.atlassian.net/browse/WPB-16073

What's new in this PR?

Issues

It is not possible to create "feature-modules" in kalium since some of the base classes are defined as internal in the kalium:logic module.

Solutions

• Created new kalium:common module
• Moved 'logic.functional` package to a new common module
• Moved CoreLogger to the common module
• Moved CoreFailure to the common module

[github-actions]

Test Results

3 519 tests  ±0   3 411 ✅ ±0   6m 6s ⏱️ -6s
  603 suites ±0     108 💤 ±0 
  603 files   ±0       0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 563222c. ± Comparison against base commit 243726b.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

Bencher Report

Branch	kalium-refactoring
Testbed	ubuntu-latest

⚠️ WARNING: No Threshold found!

Without a Threshold, no Alerts will ever be generated.

• Latency (nanoseconds (ns))

Click here to create a new Threshold
For more information, see the Threshold documentation.
To only post results if a Threshold exists, set the --ci-only-thresholds flag.

Click to view all benchmark results

Benchmark	Latency	microseconds (µs)
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.logic.CoreLogicBenchmark.createObjectInFiles	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	683.85
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.logic.CoreLogicBenchmark.createObjectInMemory	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	401,007.42
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.persistence.MessagesNoPragmaTuneBenchmark.messageInsertionBenchmark	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	1,341,787.91
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.persistence.MessagesNoPragmaTuneBenchmark.queryMessagesBenchmark	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	21,790.61

🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

[datadog-wireapp]

Datadog Report

Branch report: kalium-refactoring
Commit report: 9f8521b
Test service: kalium-jvm

✅ 0 Failed, 3411 Passed, 108 Skipped, 1m 0.14s Total Time

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 50.69%. Comparing base (243726b) to head (563222c).

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #3291      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    50.88%   50.69%   -0.19%     
===========================================
  Files         1606     1611       +5     
  Lines        58058    58102      +44     
  Branches      5204     5218      +14     
===========================================
- Hits         29541    29454      -87     
- Misses       26502    26640     +138     
+ Partials      2015     2008       -7     

see 36 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 243726b...563222c. Read the comment docs.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[vitorhugods]

A bit annoying, but necessary :(