feat: introduce custom reporters (poku, dot, compact, focus, verbose, and classic)

[wellwelwel]

Closes #629.

---

This is probably the most significant refactoring of the entire project.

This PR introduces 6 reporters:

• poku (default):
  • logs all describe, it, test and assert titles and messages, including their modifiers.
  • logs only the file name for errors during the execution, then lists all logs for each failed file at the running end.
• dot (inspired by Mocha):
  • logs a dot for each success file test and F for each failed file.
  • lists all logs for each failed file at the running end.
• compact (partially inspired by modern Tap):
  • lists only file paths with PASS or FAIL and, in case of failures, lists all logs for each failed file at the running end.
• focus:
  • Logs only errors (in real time). If there is no error, it just logs a small footnote resume.
• verbose:
  • just like the default (poku), but logs errors in real time and also at the running end.
• classic:
  • The standard report style from version 2 to preserve our history 🐷

---

⏳ Progress:

• CLI
• API
• Config File
• Documentation

Note

I intend to expose the reporter plugin to allow external reporters to be created, but I think it would be interesting to decouple this responsibility into its own PR.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 99.81982% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 99.27%. Comparing base (c0845fe) to head (0c3bd16).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/services/reporters/poku.ts	99.51%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #921      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   99.04%   99.27%   +0.23%     
==========================================
  Files          37       47      +10     
  Lines        1884     2353     +469     
  Branches       12       13       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits         1866     2336     +470     
+ Misses          9        8       -1     
  Partials        9        9              

Flag	Coverage Δ
linux	99.15% <99.81%> (+0.26%)	⬆️
osx	99.19% <99.81%> (+0.25%)	⬆️
windows	98.00% <99.81%> (-0.94%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.