-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 626
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Issue 249 fixed and other enums refactored #264
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@ | ||
"use strict"; | ||
|
||
module.exports = function testAssertions(code, stdout, stderr) { | ||
expect(stderr[3]).toContain("Error: Invalid configuration object."); | ||
expect(stderr[4]).toContain("configuration['info-verbosity'] should be one of these:"); | ||
expect(stderr[5]).toContain("\"none\" | \"info\" | \"verbose\""); | ||
expect(stderr[stderr.length - 3]).toContain("Invalid values:"); | ||
expect(stderr[stderr.length - 2]).toContain(" Argument: info-verbosity, Given: \"false\", Choices: \"none\", \"info\", \"verbose\""); | ||
}; |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe this could be done without slicing at the end of the array? If you already know the size of it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Total length will vary because adding more options into
yargs.options
will change the total length as invalid options do print out the whole usage info, but i know that -3 and -2 will be error specific values that i want to checkThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
gotcha, but the tests are static, yes? So the size will always be constant
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unless there's 9 different tests for 1 case here ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Size will change if anyone update unrelated option here and it will require this test case update.
I mean this unrelated options will increase/decrease the output line count as all of them are printed on invalid option
webpack-cli/bin/webpack.js
Lines 65 to 92 in 73fdf7d
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
while the actual error is at the end
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What is unrelated option in this case? You mean flags?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah sorry, so any update to their description or removal\addition will change lines amount
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
right. Let's keep it for now, could change it later if needed
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
true, thank you!