Use print() function in both Python 2 and Python 3 #15141
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
cclauss
requested review from
gsnedders,
jgraham,
kojiishi and
plinss
as code owners
wpt-pr-bot
added
css-fonts
infra
third_party
wptrunner
Ms2ger
previously requested changes
Feb 4, 2019
cclauss
force-pushed
the
print_function
branch
from
2a9ee02 to
a819285
Compare
|
The latest CI failures here are #15232. |
Merged
|
@Ms2ger @gsnedders Your reviews please on what remains in this PR? |
gsnedders
approved these changes
Feb 5, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Legacy print statements are syntax errors in Python 3 but print() function works as expected in both Python 2 and Python 3.