-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Test new WebIDL mixin syntax #8053
Comments
@tobie, @foolip, I saw recently that IDL from specs was being periodically automagically imported into the appropriate files in the Given all specs were fixed to no longer use |
fixed link above. |
@foolip knows the details of this. I don’t. |
That's an effort that @lukebjerring has been driving, but is now in a bit of a hiatus as we figure out what the source of IDL snippets should really be, see w3c/webref#3. |
ok great! will wait for an update from @lukebjerring. |
I can basically try and sync all of the pending PRs up to current crawled spec's state, and we can go from there for updating |
Sounds great, @lukebjerring. let us know if we can help in some way. |
Update: It looks like the e.g. Should be adding EDIT: Addressed by #12165 |
WebIDL recently introduced dedicated syntax for mixins.
This syntax replaces the
[NoInterfaceObject]
extended attribute andimplements statement
which have been deprecated (except for a few legacy uses cases explicitely mentioned in the spec).You can read more about it here.
Todo:
implements
statements.[NoInterfaceObject]
extended attribute.includes
statements and interface mixins.Tracked in: whatwg/webidl#472 | Original pull-request: whatwg/webidl#433
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: