Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support rendering node details extras #3244

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 9, 2018

Conversation

fbarl
Copy link
Contributor

@fbarl fbarl commented Jun 29, 2018

Resolves #3243.

Not to be merged before https://github.com/weaveworks/service-ui/pull/2821.

Test like #3239.

@fbarl fbarl self-assigned this Jun 29, 2018
@fbarl fbarl changed the title [WIP] Support rendering node details extras Support rendering node details extras Jun 29, 2018
@fbarl fbarl requested a review from foot June 29, 2018 14:15
Copy link
Contributor

@foot foot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

code lg!

@foot
Copy link
Contributor

foot commented Jul 2, 2018

Could this table be implemented using the scope-details-data schema? I guess not completely, but it would be another interesting way to support client plugins/customization. If there was a way to fiddle w/ the details response structure and add on another table.

Though perhaps more fragile if it was to change. Would have to document it better.

@fbarl
Copy link
Contributor Author

fbarl commented Jul 9, 2018

Could this table be implemented using the scope-details-data schema?

@foot That's an interesting idea that might become more relevant in the future - feel free to open an issue!

@fbarl fbarl merged commit 4bd0be0 into master Jul 9, 2018
@fbarl fbarl deleted the 3243-pluggable-node-details-extras branch July 9, 2018 14:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants