Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrate rest of the cmdletd under StorageAccount to Track2 SDK #20

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

yifanz0
Copy link

@yifanz0 yifanz0 commented Jul 13, 2022

Description

This PR includes changes for migrating the rest of the cmdlets that lies under StorageAccount to Track2 SDK.
Cmdlets include:

  • Get/New-AzStorageAccountKey
  • Get- AzStorageUsage
  • Invoke/Stop-AzStorageaccountHierarchicalNamespaceUpgrade
  • Revoke-AzStorageAccountUserDelegationKeys
  • Get-AzStorageAccountNameAvailability
  • Set-AzCurrentStorageAccount

Checklist

  • I have read the Submitting Changes section of CONTRIBUTING.md
  • The title of the PR is clear and informative
  • The appropriate ChangeLog.md file(s) has been updated:
    • For any service, the ChangeLog.md file can be found at src/{{SERVICE}}/{{SERVICE}}/ChangeLog.md
    • A snippet outlining the change(s) made in the PR should be written under the ## Upcoming Release header -- no new version header should be added
  • The PR does not introduce breaking changes
  • If applicable, the changes made in the PR have proper test coverage
  • For public API changes to cmdlets:
    • a cmdlet design review was approved for the changes in this repository (Microsoft internal only)
    • the markdown help files have been regenerated using the commands listed here

@yifanz0 yifanz0 requested a review from blueww July 13, 2022 07:43
Track2.BlobContainerResource blobContainerResource = this.StorageClientTrack2
.GetBlobContainerResource(this.ResourceGroupName, this.StorageAccountName, this.Name).Get().Value;

//var container = this.StorageClient.BlobContainers.Get(
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

remove the commented part

//{
// containerlistResult = this.StorageClient.BlobContainers.ListNext(containerlistResult.NextPageLink);
// WriteContainerList(containerlistResult);
//}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

remove the commented part

Copy link
Member

@blueww blueww left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there any left cmdlets?
If not, we should remove the Track1 SDK reference.

// this.ResourceGroupName,
// this.StorageAccountName,
// this.ContainerName,
// this.Etag);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

remove the commented part

//this.StorageClient.BlobContainers.ObjectLevelWorm(
// this.ResourceGroupName,
// this.StorageAccountName,
// this.Name);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

remove the commented part
Same as below

@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ public bool EnableActiveDirectoryDomainServicesForFile
HelpMessage = "Specifies the domain GUID. This parameter must be set when -EnableActiveDirectoryDomainServicesForFile is set to true.",
ParameterSetName = ActiveDirectoryDomainServicesForFileParameterSet)]
[ValidateNotNullOrEmpty]
public string ActiveDirectoryDomainGuid { get; set; }
public Guid ActiveDirectoryDomainGuid { get; set; }
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is a breaking change.
We should iether keep the input type as string, or follow the breaking process to release it.

@yifanz0 yifanz0 closed this Jul 26, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants