RFC #106: Wagtail 6.5* and 6.6* roadmap updates #106
Conversation
thibaudcolas
changed the title
|
This is now ready for review :) |
|
|
||
| The following Wagtail 6.4 roadmap items will be moved to Future: | ||
|
|
||
| - [Autosave support refactorings with Telepath](https://github.com/wagtail/roadmap/issues/47) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggestion: perhaps make explicit that Validation on publish was identified during the 6.4 release cycle as something that takes precedence, which is why this was de-prioritized.
Question: out of curiosity, does this feature have sponsors? Do any roadmap items have sponsors?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, we have a sponsor for validation-on-publish, and in fact it's constraints on the funding (and when budgets can be spent) that have led to this being prioritised above the Telepath work, rather than any technical need for it to come first.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Makes sense, thanks for that context Matt 👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In the last release, drag'n'drop support was sponsored. In this upcoming release, in addition to validation on publish, we also have site settings permissions and some of the headless work (which bits exactly TBC)
|
Thank you for the feedback @Stormheg! There are a few elements of my answers I’ll want to move within the RFC contents but I’ll leave them as comments for now for others ’ benefit. I brought this to last week’s core team meeting briefly, and yesterday’s with a few more details, so marking this as "Final Comment Period". There’s lots of time for comments, I’ll be looking at updating our roadmap towards the second half of the month assuming we get enough feedback by then. |
|
I’ve updated the RFC based on feedback (thank you @Stormheg for the excellent questions!). Unfortunately I’ve also moved "Headless preview & userbar" from the Wagtail 6.5* release to "Future" as I didn’t realise we’re not clear yet when this can go ahead. Could still be 6.5* but it’s better for us to commit to fewer things that are more firm. More reviews/ feedback very welcome! |
|
Is it worth splitting the headless preview and headless userbar into two items? Maybe it's possible to merge the headless preview package into core as a somewhat easier first step. This may help set up some momentum for headless usage, even if it's one less dependency. |
View the RFC in HTML. Once reviewed with enough feedback and approved by the core team, those changes will go live on the Wagtail Roadmap.
6.5* and 6.6*: Provisional version numbers. See our Release schedule for more info.