Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move CSS View Transitions to "fairly stable" in CSS 2023 #9577

Closed
svgeesus opened this issue Nov 8, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

Move CSS View Transitions to "fairly stable" in CSS 2023 #9577

svgeesus opened this issue Nov 8, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@svgeesus
Copy link
Contributor

svgeesus commented Nov 8, 2023

Spun out from

View Transitions 1 is a CR Snapshot and the test results show a single implementation doing well.
So it seems to meet the criteria.

@svgeesus svgeesus added Agenda+ css-view-transitions-1 View Transitions; Bugs only css-2023 The 2023 snapshot labels Nov 8, 2023
@css-meeting-bot
Copy link
Member

The CSS Working Group just discussed Move CSS View Transitions to "fairly stable" in CSS 2023, and agreed to the following:

  • RESOLVED: Add View Transitions 1 to "fairly stable" in Snapshot 2023
  • RESOLVED: moving css-view-transitions-1 to fairly stable
The full IRC log of that discussion <noamr> SebastianZ: let's talk about the second topic 1st
<noamr> rossen: ready for 9577
<noamr> rossen: Chris said he's in favor of this
<noamr> rossen: anyone else that has opinions on this or objections
<noamr> fantasai: I agree with that, it's fairly stable, level of issues dropped to a low level, and we have an implementation so we worked out kinds
<noamr> kinks
<noamr> rossen: objections to moving VT to fairly stable?
<noamr> rossen: with no objections, calling this resolved
<fantasai> RESOLVED: Add View Transitions 1 to "fairly stable" in Snapshot 2023
<noamr> RESOLVED: moving css-view-transitions-1 to fairly stable

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants