Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement unbound_exporter #498

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 16, 2021
Merged

Implement unbound_exporter #498

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 16, 2021

Conversation

bastelfreak
Copy link
Member

Pull Request (PR) description

This Pull Request (PR) fixes the following issues

@bastelfreak bastelfreak added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 26, 2020
@bastelfreak bastelfreak self-assigned this Sep 26, 2020
manifests/unbound_exporter.pp Show resolved Hide resolved
manifests/unbound_exporter.pp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
manifests/unbound_exporter.pp Show resolved Hide resolved
# @param init_style
# Service startup scripts style (e.g. rc, upstart or systemd)
# @param install_method
# Installation method: url or package (only url is supported currently)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is url supported? Or it is if URL is to a local mirror where you've built the binary??
Maybe include an @example Installing from your own package repository or something based on how you're currently using this?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

at the moment I compiled the binary by myself and copied it into /usr/local/bin/unbound_exporter. I was hoping that letsencrypt/unbound_exporter#21 will be solved soon. That would enable this class to download the exporter from there. maybe we should keep this PR open until they provide proper releases.

@alexjfisher alexjfisher dismissed their stale review December 3, 2020 20:28

Issues fixed

Copy link
Member

@alexjfisher alexjfisher left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is probably ok. Maybe just add an example for added clarity on how a user might use this.

@ghoneycutt ghoneycutt merged commit 5121ec0 into voxpupuli:master Feb 16, 2021
cegeka-jenkins pushed a commit to cegeka/puppet-prometheus that referenced this pull request Mar 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants