Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add crl renewal #256

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 5, 2018
Merged

Add crl renewal #256

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 5, 2018

Conversation

to-kn
Copy link
Contributor

@to-kn to-kn commented Dec 27, 2017

Add a solution to the Problem described in #236
Had in running in production for ~half a year now, with no problems...
Included some basic tests - feel free, to suggest any change or anything else

@@ -497,6 +511,9 @@
$rcvbuf = undef,
$shared_ca = undef,
$crl_verify = true,
$crl_auto_renew = false,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you add datatypes for the new params?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shure, if you want me to do that - i did not, since none of the params has datatypes yet...

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah, we want to have datatypes for all new params

@bastelfreak
Copy link
Member

Hi @to-kn, thanks for the PR. Can you take a look at hte inline comment and the failing spec tests?

@bastelfreak bastelfreak added enhancement New feature or request tests-fail labels Jan 3, 2018
@to-kn
Copy link
Contributor Author

to-kn commented Jan 4, 2018

Hi @bastelfreak the tests should be finde now. (the first one failing has nothing to do with the code). anything else?

@bastelfreak
Copy link
Member

Can you rebase please? I fixed the travis error in #257 (maybe)

@to-kn
Copy link
Contributor Author

to-kn commented Jan 5, 2018

looks good! (they passed...)

@bastelfreak
Copy link
Member

@to-kn can you rebase please? Afterwards I can merge it.

@to-kn to-kn force-pushed the add_crl_renewal branch 2 times, most recently from 6e038c4 to 1744d5b Compare January 5, 2018 22:56
add parameters: crl_auto_renew, crl_renew_schedule_period, crl_renew_schedule_repeat
fix spec-tests
@@ -497,6 +511,9 @@
Optional[Integer] $rcvbuf = undef,
Optional[String] $shared_ca = undef,
Boolean $crl_verify = true,
Boolean $crl_auto_renew = false,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Datatypes \o/

@bastelfreak bastelfreak merged commit bddfaef into voxpupuli:master Jan 5, 2018
@to-kn to-kn deleted the add_crl_renewal branch January 6, 2018 08:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants