Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

giac: update to 1.9.0.29. #40491

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 24, 2022
Merged

giac: update to 1.9.0.29. #40491

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 24, 2022

Conversation

tornaria
Copy link
Contributor

Testing the changes

  • I tested the changes in this PR: briefly

Also: use openblas instead of lapack when available.
@classabbyamp classabbyamp merged commit dc692b9 into void-linux:master Nov 24, 2022
@dkwo
Copy link
Contributor

dkwo commented Nov 28, 2022

is it expected that now giac does not depend on blas or lapack on x86_64-musl? I only realised it now, after xbps-remove -oO, and guessed this pr made the change.

@tornaria
Copy link
Contributor Author

is it expected that now giac does not depend on blas or lapack on x86_64-musl? I only realised it now, after xbps-remove -oO, and guessed this pr made the change.

Yes. I've been changing packages to prefer using openblas rather than lapack when available. See for example #39846 (SuiteSparse, cvxopt) and #40224 (igraph) which are awaiting merge.

The point is that lapack is just a portable reference implementation of blas/lapack that is replaceable by an optimized implementation like openblas (or the one by intel, but I don't think it's free).

@tornaria tornaria deleted the giac branch December 7, 2022 00:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants