Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

control-service: Include additional labels for service template #255

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 17, 2021

Conversation

gabrielgeorgiev1
Copy link
Contributor

Currently, there is no way for a control-service deployment to
add additional labels for their service instance. This change
allows the addition of such through Values.yml.

Testing done: generated template locally using helm install
--dry-run and verified the additional labels are added correctly
and are formatted appropriately

Signed-off-by: gageorgiev [email protected]

Copy link
Contributor

@doks5 doks5 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are the cockroach and common charts necessary?

Currently, there is no way for a control-service deployment to
add additional labels for their service instance. This change
allows the addition of such through Values.yml.

Testing done: generated template locally using helm install
--dry-run and verified the additional labels are added correctly
and are formatted appropriately

Signed-off-by: gageorgiev <[email protected]>
@gabrielgeorgiev1 gabrielgeorgiev1 force-pushed the person/gageorgiev/include-add-labels-service branch from 98eea89 to f7c777b Compare September 17, 2021 14:47
@gabrielgeorgiev1 gabrielgeorgiev1 enabled auto-merge (squash) September 17, 2021 14:48
@gabrielgeorgiev1 gabrielgeorgiev1 merged commit f22d97b into main Sep 17, 2021
@gabrielgeorgiev1 gabrielgeorgiev1 deleted the person/gageorgiev/include-add-labels-service branch September 17, 2021 15:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants