Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

mysqlctl: Remove usage of MYSQL_FLAVOR #13135

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 23, 2023

Conversation

dbussink
Copy link
Contributor

@dbussink dbussink commented May 23, 2023

After the changes in #13123, I realized that there's no cases left where we actually use or depend on MYSQL_FLAVOR.

This means we can actually remove usages of MYSQL_FLAVOR. It doesn't yet remove it from the artifacts we build, because we shouldn't clean that up until v18 then because users might mix versions during the upgrade and we don't want to have old code that still depends on this fail then.

Related Issue(s)

Follow up to #13123

Checklist

  • "Backport to:" labels have been added if this change should be back-ported
  • Tests were added or are not required
  • Did the new or modified tests pass consistently locally and on the CI
  • Documentation was added or is not required

After the changes in vitessio#13123, I
realized that there's no cases left where we actually use or depend on
`MYSQL_FLAVOR`.

This means we can actually remove usages of `MYSQL_FLAVOR`. It doesn't
yet remove it from the artifacts we build, because we shouldn't clean
that up until v18 then because users might mix versions during the
upgrade and we don't want to have old code that still depends on this
fail then.

Signed-off-by: Dirkjan Bussink <[email protected]>
@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says labels May 23, 2023
@vitess-bot
Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented May 23, 2023

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • If this is a change that users need to know about, please apply the release notes (needs details) label so that merging is blocked unless the summary release notes document is included.
  • If a test is added or modified, there should be a documentation on top of the test to explain what the expected behavior is what the test does.

If a new flag is being introduced:

  • Is it really necessary to add this flag?
  • Flag names should be clear and intuitive (as far as possible)
  • Help text should be descriptive.
  • Flag names should use dashes (-) as word separators rather than underscores (_).

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow should be required, the maintainer team should be notified.

Bug fixes

  • There should be at least one unit or end-to-end test.
  • The Pull Request description should include a link to an issue that describes the bug.

Non-trivial changes

  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.

New/Existing features

  • Should be documented, either by modifying the existing documentation or creating new documentation.
  • New features should have a link to a feature request issue or an RFC that documents the use cases, corner cases and test cases.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from VTop, if used there.

@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v17.0.0 milestone May 23, 2023
@dbussink dbussink added NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says and removed NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request labels May 23, 2023
@dbussink
Copy link
Contributor Author

Found some remaining references in the docs which I'm cleaning up in vitessio/website#1479.

@dbussink dbussink removed the NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says label May 23, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@mattlord mattlord left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like it! The MYSQL_FLAVOR related behavior always felt very unintuitive to me for a variety of reasons (e.g. mysql56 is really about MySQL GTID replication and that's it AFAIK).

Thanks!

@mattlord
Copy link
Contributor

@dbussink the only thing that I think we might want to do is add a note to the v17 release notes summary that this ENV var is no longer used. IMO we should do that. What do others think?

@dbussink
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dbussink the only thing that I think we might want to do is add a note to the v17 release notes summary that this ENV var is no longer used. IMO we should do that. What do others think?

Happy to do so if others also agree. @deepthi Do you have an opinion on this?

@deepthi
Copy link
Member

deepthi commented May 23, 2023

@dbussink the only thing that I think we might want to do is add a note to the v17 release notes summary that this ENV var is no longer used. IMO we should do that. What do others think?

Happy to do so if others also agree. @deepthi Do you have an opinion on this?

Yes, let's do that. Also, the examples need to be updated to match. I checked the examples and they already don't set this ENV var, so that part is good.

@deepthi deepthi added the release notes (needs details) This PR needs to be listed in the release notes in a dedicated section (deprecation notice, etc...) label May 23, 2023
@dbussink dbussink removed the release notes (needs details) This PR needs to be listed in the release notes in a dedicated section (deprecation notice, etc...) label May 23, 2023
Copy link
Member

@deepthi deepthi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💯

@deepthi deepthi merged commit bad9b6e into vitessio:main May 23, 2023
@deepthi deepthi deleted the dbussink/cleanup-mysql-flavor branch May 23, 2023 18:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants