Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add --init-alloc-size parameter for fast initial allocation #6

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

iholder101
Copy link

@iholder101 iholder101 commented Dec 18, 2024

Often, it is useful to first allocate a big chunk of memory
before continuing to gradually allocate smaller chunks
to cuase stress.

For example, let's say that someone is trying to hit a
certain memory limit of 5GB. In such a case, it is often
useful to first allocate 4GBs in one big chunk fastly,
and then continue stressing the system using allocation
size of 16MB each 5 seconds.

After this PR, the following is possible:
stress -mem-total 5Gi -mem-alloc-size 16Mi -mem-alloc-sleep 5s -init-alloc-size 4Gi

p.s. basing this PR on #5. Will remove once this PR is merged.

nirvanagit and others added 4 commits September 4, 2024 11:51
Often, it is useful to first allocate a big chunk of memory
before continuing to gradually allocate smaller chunks
to cuase stress.

For example, let's say that someone is trying to hit a
certain memory limit of 5GB. In such a case, it is often
useful to first allocate 4GBs in one big chunk fastly,
and then continue stressing the system using allocation
size of 16MB each 5 seconds.

After this PR, the following is possible:
stress -mem-total 5Gi -mem-alloc-size 16Mi -mem-alloc-sleep 5s
-init-alloc-size 4Gi

Signed-off-by: Itamar Holder <[email protected]>
@iholder101
Copy link
Author

@vishh would be happy if you could take a look.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants