Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SSM and systems groups #9787

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Pablogoliva
Copy link
Contributor

What does this PR change?

This PR adds some smoke test to SSM and systems groups test features and fixes:https://github.com/SUSE/spacewalk/issues/15437

GUI diff

No difference.

  • DONE

Documentation

  • No documentation needed

  • DONE

Test coverage

  • Cucumber tests were added

  • DONE

Links

Issue(s): https://github.com/SUSE/spacewalk/issues/15437
Port(s):

  • Manager 5.0:

  • Manager 4.3:

  • DONE

Changelogs

Make sure the changelogs entries you are adding are compliant with https://github.com/uyuni-project/uyuni/wiki/Contributing#changelogs and https://github.com/uyuni-project/uyuni/wiki/Contributing#uyuni-projectuyuni-repository

If you don't need a changelog check, please mark this checkbox:

  • No changelog needed

If you uncheck the checkbox after the PR is created, you will need to re-run changelog_test (see below)

Re-run a test

If you need to re-run a test, please mark the related checkbox, it will be unchecked automatically once it has re-run:

  • Re-run test "changelog_test"
  • Re-run test "backend_unittests_pgsql"
  • Re-run test "java_pgsql_tests"
  • Re-run test "schema_migration_test_pgsql"
  • Re-run test "susemanager_unittests"
  • Re-run test "javascript_lint"
  • Re-run test "spacecmd_unittests"

Before you merge

Check How to branch and merge properly!

@Pablogoliva Pablogoliva self-assigned this Feb 14, 2025
@Pablogoliva Pablogoliva requested a review from a team as a code owner February 14, 2025 15:04
Copy link
Contributor

👋 Hello! Thanks for contributing to our project.
Acceptance tests will take some time (aprox. 1h), please be patient ☕

You can see the progress at the end of this page and at https://github.com/uyuni-project/uyuni/pull/9787/checks
Once tests finish, if they fail, you can check 👀 the cucumber report. See the link at the output of the action.
You can also check the artifacts section, which contains the logs at https://github.com/uyuni-project/uyuni/pull/9787/checks.

If you are unsure the failing tests are related to your code, you can check the "reference jobs". These are jobs that run on a scheduled time with code from master. If they fail for the same reason as your build, it means the tests or the infrastructure are broken. If they do not fail, but yours do, it means it is related to your code.

Reference tests:

KNOWN ISSUES

Sometimes the build can fail when pulling new jar files from download.opensuse.org . This is a known limitation. Given this happens rarely, when it does, all you need to do is rerun the test. Sorry for the inconvenience.

For more tips on troubleshooting, see the troubleshooting guide.

Happy hacking!
⚠️ You should not merge if acceptance tests fail to pass. ⚠️

Copy link
Contributor

@Bischoff Bischoff left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

see comments

Copy link
Contributor

@NamelessOne91 NamelessOne91 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks Pablo

I left some nitpicks/suggestion which are about naming scenarios and form.
The actual logic and steps LGTM

PS: add an empty new line at the end of the file ;)

@Pablogoliva Pablogoliva force-pushed the ssm_and_systems_groups branch from cf0c08a to 0af3e26 Compare February 17, 2025 11:00
@Pablogoliva Pablogoliva changed the title Ssm and systems groups SSM and systems groups Feb 17, 2025
@Pablogoliva Pablogoliva force-pushed the ssm_and_systems_groups branch from 0af3e26 to 4230831 Compare February 17, 2025 11:46
@Pablogoliva Pablogoliva force-pushed the ssm_and_systems_groups branch from 4230831 to b6cb4aa Compare February 17, 2025 12:03
Copy link
Contributor

@ktsamis ktsamis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Small question about removing RHlike minion from the group, why do we do that? Otherwise seems good

Bischoff
Bischoff previously approved these changes Feb 17, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@Bischoff Bischoff left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

NamelessOne91
NamelessOne91 previously approved these changes Feb 17, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@NamelessOne91 NamelessOne91 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the changes, LGTM

ktsamis
ktsamis previously approved these changes Feb 17, 2025
@Pablogoliva Pablogoliva force-pushed the ssm_and_systems_groups branch from 1fd96a9 to a4b8370 Compare February 18, 2025 09:03
@@ -1,47 +1,125 @@
# Copyright (c) 2017-2024 SUSE LLC
# Copyright (c) 2017-2025 SUSE LLC
# Licensed under the terms of the MIT license.

@scope_visualization
Copy link
Member

@srbarrios srbarrios Feb 18, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What about include the tag @sle_minion ?
This feature depends on having a SLE minion deployed, so it make sense to skip it if the minion is not present.

@@ -1,47 +1,125 @@
# Copyright (c) 2017-2024 SUSE LLC
# Copyright (c) 2017-2025 SUSE LLC
# Licensed under the terms of the MIT license.

@scope_visualization
Copy link
Member

@srbarrios srbarrios Feb 18, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also, as we are enhancing this feature, maybe we can also consider to create a new Cucumber profile.
If you go to testsuite/config/cucumber.yml you will see that we have a list of Cucumber profiles, that runs when the Cucumber feature have some specified tags.

What about creating a new one for the SSM feature?

ssm: --tags @scope_ssm

And then we add the new tag on top of this feature like:

@scope_visualization
@scope_ssm
@sle_minion
Feature: Manage a group of systems
...

Some info about Cucumber profiles integration explained on these slides: https://oubiti.com/smart-integration-tests/

srbarrios
srbarrios previously approved these changes Feb 18, 2025
Copy link
Member

@srbarrios srbarrios left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just some suggestions, but LGTM

@Pablogoliva Pablogoliva force-pushed the ssm_and_systems_groups branch 3 times, most recently from 7bc87fc to 0eb16e9 Compare February 18, 2025 11:16
@Pablogoliva Pablogoliva force-pushed the ssm_and_systems_groups branch 5 times, most recently from 319dc14 to cbb10dc Compare February 19, 2025 14:36
…on of packages

and patches can be done in a system groups and in a SSM
@Pablogoliva Pablogoliva force-pushed the ssm_and_systems_groups branch 2 times, most recently from 2afc433 to 28306d5 Compare February 20, 2025 15:12
@Pablogoliva Pablogoliva force-pushed the ssm_and_systems_groups branch from 28306d5 to b535f37 Compare February 20, 2025 16:00
@Pablogoliva Pablogoliva force-pushed the ssm_and_systems_groups branch from f012079 to c49467d Compare February 21, 2025 08:57
@Pablogoliva Pablogoliva force-pushed the ssm_and_systems_groups branch 2 times, most recently from dbaa3a0 to 412b8b9 Compare February 21, 2025 13:54
@Pablogoliva
Copy link
Contributor Author

Small question about removing RHlike minion from the group, why do we do that? Otherwise seems good

Because this test was worng were missing sle_mions with rhlike minions

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants