Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(contracts-node): sync polkadot stable2409 #1

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Nov 21, 2024

Conversation

al3mart
Copy link

@al3mart al3mart commented Nov 15, 2024

This PR uplifts versions and sync substrate-contracts-node with SDK version polkadot-stable2409.
Aside from the application of the different commits coming with the version update, the collator has been change from using a basic collator to lookahead.
Crate versions have also been bumped to 0.42.0.

@al3mart al3mart changed the title Al3mart/sync polkadot stable2409 chore(contracts-node): sync polkadot stable2409 Nov 15, 2024
Copy link

@cmichi cmichi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, @al3mart!

@cmichi cmichi merged commit 6e7f232 into main Nov 21, 2024
@cmichi cmichi deleted the al3mart/sync-polkadot-stable2409 branch November 21, 2024 07:13
smiasojed pushed a commit to paritytech/substrate-contracts-node that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2024
…238)

Credit for the main work has to go to @al3mart with
use-ink#1 and
use-ink#2.

## Synced with `polkadot-stable2409`
>This PR uplifts versions and sync `substrate-contracts-node` with SDK
version `polkadot-stable2409`.
>Aside from the application of the different commits coming with the
version update, the collator has been change from using a basic collator
to lookahead.
>Crate versions have also been bumped to 0.42.0.

## Added `pallet-revive`

> Inclusion of `pallet-revive` along with `pallet-contracts`. Such that
the runtimes will feature both VMs.

---------

Co-authored-by: Alejandro Martinez Andres <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants