Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Separate out ensemble verification (gen-ens-prod and ensemble-stat) #382

Closed
mkavulich opened this issue Sep 28, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #683
Closed

Separate out ensemble verification (gen-ens-prod and ensemble-stat) #382

mkavulich opened this issue Sep 28, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #683
Labels
enhancement New feature or request Needs more definition This issue needs more details; user applying this tag should leave comment detailing what is needed Priority: low

Comments

@mkavulich
Copy link
Collaborator

mkavulich commented Sep 28, 2022

Original issue opened by @michelleharrold migrated from regional_workflow repository: ufs-community/regional_workflow#709

Description

In METv10.1, the ensemble-stat tool has been split into two distinct tools: gen-ens-prod (new tool; creates ensemble products) and ensemble-stat (calculates ensemble stats). While METv10.1 supports backward compatibility of old ensemble-stat tool (product generation + ensemble verification), it would be good to pivot to new functionality/tools before it becomes deprecated.

Solution

Breakout out current ensemble verification that uses MET ensemble-stat tool into gen-ens-prod tool and ensemble-stat tool.

Requirements**

Acceptance Criteria (Definition of Done)

@mkavulich mkavulich added enhancement New feature or request Priority: low labels Sep 28, 2022
@mkavulich mkavulich added the Needs more definition This issue needs more details; user applying this tag should leave comment detailing what is needed label Sep 28, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request Needs more definition This issue needs more details; user applying this tag should leave comment detailing what is needed Priority: low
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant