Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename SAR to LAM and JP to ESG, remove fix files #268

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Aug 18, 2020
Merged

Rename SAR to LAM and JP to ESG, remove fix files #268

merged 15 commits into from
Aug 18, 2020

Conversation

JeffBeck-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

@JeffBeck-NOAA JeffBeck-NOAA commented Aug 17, 2020

DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES:

This PR replaces all references to FV3-SAR or SAR-FV3 with FV3-LAM, and JPgrid with ESGgrid. Note that certain directory paths used by EMC or other code developers that reference FV3-SAR could not be changed, so their references in the workflow files are left as is.

All fix files have now been removed from regional_workflow, since they can be sourced from the FIXgsm or the UPP repository directly.

TESTS CONDUCTED:

End-to-end tests on Hera succeeded for the 25-km CONUS domain using the FV3_GSD_SAR and FV3_GFS_2017_gfdlmp SDFs.

ISSUE (optional):

These changes resolve issues #252 and #262.

@JeffBeck-NOAA JeffBeck-NOAA changed the title Feature/rename Rename SAR to LAM and JP to ESG Aug 17, 2020
@mkavulich
Copy link
Collaborator

@JeffBeck-NOAA Just out of curiosity, what platform did you run the tests on? I can run the end-to-end test suite on either Jet or Hera, whichever you did not test; that should be sufficient to check that all the renaming was done successfully.

@JeffBeck-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@mkavulich I tested on Hera (just updated the PR message). If you can run on Jet, that'd be appreciated!

@mkavulich mkavulich changed the title Rename SAR to LAM and JP to ESG Rename SAR to LAM and JP to ESG, remove fix files Aug 18, 2020
Copy link
Collaborator

@mkavulich mkavulich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All tests pass on Jet aside from nco tests, regional_010 (which has a known issue), and user_staged_extrn_files (which does not have data staged on Jet). Looks good.

@JeffBeck-NOAA JeffBeck-NOAA merged commit 09a06f3 into ufs-community:develop Aug 18, 2020
christinaholtNOAA pushed a commit to christinaholtNOAA/regional_workflow that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants