This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 1, 2020. It is now read-only.
Removed obsolete functionality #2
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Now that we have macros a lot of functionality is obsolete. - Removed most of the java beans. - Removed scala xml. - Removed not implemented exception. - ??? now throws a runtime exception, the same as sys.error (another function of type Nothing).
|
👎 on 👍 on Scala XML. No clue on Java Beans, never used them. |
|
Again, compatibility questions here. If we are ok not being able to compile code which successfully compiles with scalac, then sure go for it, but that is precisely the distinction you would be drawing here. |
|
Agreed, but removing XML literals is relatively uncontroversial (apart from legacy reasons), so our guidelines should support such cases. See #14. However, we might want to ensure though that there's a migration path: I know macro enable creating one, but the with the same argument. |
|
@djspiewak I've been under the impression that all scalac source will be compilable under typelevelc and I think it's very important. We need to figure this out as part of #14. |
|
@puffnfresh This one could go under |
|
@Blaisorblade of the 4 PRs I made yesterday, this is the one concerned with the main compiler source base. So yes, ??? Is unrelated to macros. I would expect |
puffnfresh
pushed a commit
to puffnfresh/scala
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 30, 2015
Under `-Ydelambdafy:method`, a public, static accessor method is
created to expose the private method containing the body of the
lambda.
Currently this accessor method has its parameters in the same order
structure as those of the lambda body method.
What is this order? There are three categories of parameters:
1. lambda parameters
2. captured parameters (added by lambdalift)
3. self parameters (added to lambda bodies that end up in trait
impl classes by mixin, and added unconditionally to the static
accessor method.)
These are currently emitted in order typelevel#3, typelevel#1, typelevel#2.
Here are examples of the current behaviour:
BEFORE (trait):
```
% cat sandbox/test.scala && scalac-hash v2.11.5 -Ydelambdafy:method sandbox/test.scala && javap -private -classpath . 'Test$class'
trait Member; class Capture; trait LambdaParam
trait Test {
def member: Member
def foo {
val local = new Capture
(arg: LambdaParam) => "" + arg + member + local
}
}
Compiled from "test.scala"
public abstract class Test$class {
public static void foo(Test);
private static final java.lang.String $anonfun$1(Test, LambdaParam, Capture);
public static void $init$(Test);
public static final java.lang.String accessor$1(Test, LambdaParam, Capture);
}
```
BEFORE (class):
```
% cat sandbox/test.scala && scalac-hash v2.11.5 -Ydelambdafy:method sandbox/test.scala && javap -private -classpath . Test
trait Member; class Capture; trait LambdaParam
abstract class Test {
def member: Member
def foo {
val local = new Capture
(arg: LambdaParam) => "" + arg + member + local
}
}
Compiled from "test.scala"
public abstract class Test {
public abstract Member member();
public void foo();
private final java.lang.String $anonfun$1(LambdaParam, Capture);
public Test();
public static final java.lang.String accessor$1(Test, LambdaParam, Capture);
}
```
Contrasting the class case with Java:
```
% cat sandbox/Test.java && javac -d . sandbox/Test.java && javap -private -classpath . Test
public abstract class Test {
public static class Member {};
public static class Capture {};
public static class LambaParam {};
public static interface I {
public abstract Object c(LambaParam arg);
}
public abstract Member member();
public void test() {
Capture local = new Capture();
I i1 = (LambaParam arg) -> "" + member() + local;
}
}
Compiled from "Test.java"
public abstract class Test {
public Test();
public abstract Test$Member member();
public void test();
private java.lang.Object lambda$test$0(Test$Capture, Test$LambaParam);
}
```
We can see that in Java 8 lambda parameters come after captures. If we
want to use Java's LambdaMetafactory to spin up our anoymous FunctionN
subclasses on the fly, our ordering must change.
I can see three options for change:
1. Adjust `LambdaLift` to always prepend captured parameters,
rather than appending them. I think we could leave `Mixin` as
it is, it already prepends the self parameter. This would result
a parameter ordering, in terms of the list above: typelevel#3, typelevel#2, typelevel#1.
2. More conservatively, do this just for methods known to hold
lambda bodies. This might avoid needlessly breaking code that
has come to depend on our binary encoding.
3. Adjust the parameters of the accessor method only. The body
of this method can permute params before calling the lambda
body method.
This commit implements option typelevel#2.
In also prototyped typelevel#1, and found it worked so long as I limited it to
non-constructors, to sidestep the need to make corresponding
changes elsewhere in the compiler to avoid the crasher shown
in the enclosed test case, which was minimized from a bootstrap
failure from an earlier a version of this patch.
We would need to defer option typelevel#1 to 2.12 in any case, as some of
these lifted methods are publicied by the optimizer, and we must
leave the signatures alone to comply with MiMa.
I've included a test that shows this in all in action. However, that
is currently disabled, as we don't have a partest category for tests
that require Java 8.
folone
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 14, 2015
The log messages intented to chronicle implicit search were always being filtered out by virtue of the fact that the the tree passed to `printTyping` was already typed, (e.g. with an implicit MethodType.) This commit enabled printing in this case, although it still filters out trees that are deemed unfit for typer tracing, such as `()`. In the context of implicit search, this happens to filter out the noise of: ``` | | | [search #2] start `()`, searching for adaptation to pt=Unit => Foo[Int,Int] (silent: value <local Test> in Test) implicits disabled | | | [search #3] start `()`, searching for adaptation to pt=(=> Unit) => Foo[Int,Int] (silent: value <local Test> in Test) implicits disabled | | | \-> <error> ``` ... which I think is desirable. The motivation for this fix was to better display the interaction between implicit search and type inference. For instance: ``` class Foo[A, B] class Test { implicit val f: Foo[Int, String] = ??? def t[A, B](a: A)(implicit f: Foo[A, B]) = ??? t(1) } ``` ```` % scalac -Ytyper-debug sandbox/instantiate.scala ... | |-- t(1) BYVALmode-EXPRmode (site: value <local Test> in Test) | | |-- t BYVALmode-EXPRmode-FUNmode-POLYmode (silent: value <local Test> in Test) | | | [adapt] [A, B](a: A)(implicit f: Foo[A,B])Nothing adapted to [A, B](a: A)(implicit f: Foo[A,B])Nothing | | | \-> (a: A)(implicit f: Foo[A,B])Nothing | | |-- 1 BYVALmode-EXPRmode-POLYmode (site: value <local Test> in Test) | | | \-> Int(1) | | solving for (A: ?A, B: ?B) | | solving for (B: ?B) | | [search #1] start `[A, B](a: A)(implicit f: Foo[A,B])Nothing` inferring type B, searching for adaptation to pt=Foo[Int,B] (silent: value <local Test> in Test) implicits disabled | | [search #1] considering f | | [adapt] f adapted to => Foo[Int,String] based on pt Foo[Int,B] | | [search #1] solve tvars=?B, tvars.constr= >: String <: String | | solving for (B: ?B) | | [search #1] success inferred value of type Foo[Int,=?String] is SearchResult(Test.this.f, TreeTypeSubstituter(List(type B),List(String))) | | |-- [A, B](a: A)(implicit f: Foo[A,B])Nothing BYVALmode-EXPRmode (site: value <local Test> in Test) | | | \-> Nothing | | [adapt] [A, B](a: A)(implicit f: Foo[A,B])Nothing adapted to [A, B](a: A)(implicit f: Foo[A,B])Nothing | | \-> Nothing ```
larsrh
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 24, 2016
Adds sbt-microsites Plugin and Resources
milessabin
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 24, 2016
Top level modules in Scala currently desugar as:
```
class C; object O extends C { toString }
```
```
public final class O$ extends C {
public static final O$ MODULE$;
public static {};
Code:
0: new #2 // class O$
3: invokespecial #12 // Method "<init>":()V
6: return
private O$();
Code:
0: aload_0
1: invokespecial #13 // Method C."<init>":()V
4: aload_0
5: putstatic #15 // Field MODULE$:LO$;
8: aload_0
9: invokevirtual #21 // Method java/lang/Object.toString:()Ljava/lang/String;
12: pop
13: return
}
```
The static initalizer `<clinit>` calls the constructor `<init>`, which
invokes superclass constructor, assigns `MODULE$= this`, and then runs
the remainder of the object's constructor (`toString` in the example
above.)
It turns out that this relies on a bug in the JVM's verifier: assignment to a
static final must occur lexically within the <clinit>, not from within `<init>`
(even if the latter is happens to be called by the former).
I'd like to move the assignment to <clinit> but that would
change behaviour of "benign" cyclic references between modules.
Example:
```
package p1; class CC { def foo = O.bar}; object O {new CC().foo; def bar = println(1)};
// Exiting paste mode, now interpreting.
scala> p1.O
1
```
This relies on the way that we assign MODULE$ field after the super class constructors
are finished, but before the rest of the module constructor is called.
Instead, this commit removes the ACC_FINAL bit from the field. It actually wasn't
behaving as final at all, precisely the issue that the stricter verifier
now alerts us to.
```
scala> :paste -raw
// Entering paste mode (ctrl-D to finish)
package p1; object O
// Exiting paste mode, now interpreting.
scala> val O1 = p1.O
O1: p1.O.type = p1.O$@ee7d9f1
scala> scala.reflect.ensureAccessible(p1.O.getClass.getDeclaredConstructor()).newInstance()
res0: p1.O.type = p1.O$@64cee07
scala> O1 eq p1.O
res1: Boolean = false
```
We will still achieve safe publication of the assignment to other threads
by virtue of the fact that `<clinit>` is executed within the scope of
an initlization lock, as specified by:
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jvms/se8/html/jvms-5.html#jvms-5.5
Fixes scala/scala-dev#SD-194
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Now that we have macros a lot of compiler functionality is obsolete.