Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Nuke onnx models from test #6890

Merged
merged 19 commits into from
Feb 22, 2024
Merged

Nuke onnx models from test #6890

merged 19 commits into from
Feb 22, 2024

Conversation

oandreeva-nv
Copy link
Contributor

I disabled some onnx tests, but mostly replaced onnx models with libtorch models.
The only question left with L0_mlflow. I don't know as of now if onnx models are required for this test or not.
If yes, we should probably disable this test.

mc-nv
mc-nv previously approved these changes Feb 16, 2024
plan_name = tu.get_model_name("plan", np.float32, np.float32, np.float32)

ensemble_prefix = "simple_"
onnx_ensemble_name = ensemble_prefix + onnx_name
graphdef_ensemble_name = ensemble_prefix + graphdef_name

Check notice

Code scanning / CodeQL

Unused local variable Note

Variable graphdef_ensemble_name is not used.
@mc-nv mc-nv self-requested a review February 21, 2024 22:31
@mc-nv mc-nv merged commit af48a41 into r24.02 Feb 22, 2024
3 checks passed
@mc-nv mc-nv deleted the oandreeva_r2402_nuke_onnx_models branch February 22, 2024 01:03
pvijayakrish pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 15, 2025
* Elimitated usage of onnx models in tests/ disabled some tests

* Verified green: batch 1

* Verified tests: batch 2

* Verified tests: batch 3

* Verified tests: batch 4

* Verified tests: batch 5

* Verified tests: batch 6

* Verified tests: batch 7

* Verified tests: batch 8

* Verified tests: batch 9

* Verified tests: batch 10

* Verified tests: batch 11

* Verified tests: batch 12

* Verified tests: batch 12_follow up

* Verified tests: batch 13

* Verified tests: batch 14

* Verified tests: batch 15

* Verified tests: batch 16

* Removed exits
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants