Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ROL: Secant parameter is ignored in TrustRegionStep initializer #8736

Closed
angus-g opened this issue Feb 11, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

ROL: Secant parameter is ignored in TrustRegionStep initializer #8736

angus-g opened this issue Feb 11, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
CLOSED_DUE_TO_INACTIVITY Issue or PR has been closed by the GitHub Actions bot due to inactivity. MARKED_FOR_CLOSURE Issue or PR is marked for auto-closure by the GitHub Actions bot. type: bug The primary issue is a bug in Trilinos code or tests

Comments

@angus-g
Copy link

angus-g commented Feb 11, 2021

Bug Report

@trilinos/rol

Description

ROL::TrustRegionStep has a two-argument initializer which takes an additional secant parameter, similar to other Steps. This parameter is however ignored and the secant_ member is always initialized to a null-pointer, which then causes it to be initialized with the default method. This two-argument initializer doesn't seem to be used anywhere, in the package itself, but the behaviour seems to be unwarranted nonetheless.

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Create an instance of a ROL::Secant
  2. Call ROL::TrustRegionStep(secant, params)
  3. An L-BFGS secant is created and the provided one is ignored.
@angus-g angus-g added the type: bug The primary issue is a bug in Trilinos code or tests label Feb 11, 2021
@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has had no activity for 365 days and is marked for closure. It will be closed after an additional 30 days of inactivity.
If you would like to keep this issue open please add a comment and/or remove the MARKED_FOR_CLOSURE label.
If this issue should be kept open even with no activity beyond the time limits you can add the label DO_NOT_AUTOCLOSE.
If it is ok for this issue to be closed, feel free to go ahead and close it. Please do not add any comments or change any labels or otherwise touch this issue unless your intention is to reset the inactivity counter for an additional year.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the MARKED_FOR_CLOSURE Issue or PR is marked for auto-closure by the GitHub Actions bot. label Mar 19, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link

This issue was closed due to inactivity for 395 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the CLOSED_DUE_TO_INACTIVITY Issue or PR has been closed by the GitHub Actions bot due to inactivity. label Apr 20, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLOSED_DUE_TO_INACTIVITY Issue or PR has been closed by the GitHub Actions bot due to inactivity. MARKED_FOR_CLOSURE Issue or PR is marked for auto-closure by the GitHub Actions bot. type: bug The primary issue is a bug in Trilinos code or tests
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant