Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replaced deprecated method Poly_Triangulation Triangles() #1386

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 14, 2024

Conversation

rsm-gh
Copy link
Contributor

@rsm-gh rsm-gh commented Nov 13, 2024

Replaced deprecated method Poly_Triangulation Triangles() with Triangle()

Summary by Sourcery

Enhancements:

  • Replace deprecated method Poly_Triangulation::Triangles() with Triangle() to ensure compatibility with updated API.

Replaced deprecated method
Copy link

sourcery-ai bot commented Nov 13, 2024

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

The PR updates the triangle retrieval method in the shape tessellation code by replacing the deprecated Triangles() method with the newer Triangle() method. The change maintains the same functionality while using the updated API.

Class diagram for ShapeTesselator changes

classDiagram
    class ShapeTesselator {
        +void Tesselate(bool compute_edges, float mesh_quality, bool parallel)
    }
    class Poly_Triangulation {
        +Standard_Integer NbTriangles()
        +void Triangle(Standard_Integer nt)
    }
    ShapeTesselator --> Poly_Triangulation : uses
    note for Poly_Triangulation "Replaced deprecated Triangles() with Triangle()"
Loading

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Updated triangle retrieval method in tessellation implementation
  • Replaced deprecated Poly_Array1OfTriangle Triangles() with direct Triangle() method calls
  • Changed triangle array size calculation to use NbTriangles() directly
  • Updated triangle vertex retrieval to use Triangle(nt) instead of triangles(nt)
src/Tesselator/ShapeTesselator.cpp

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
    this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @rsm-gh - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟢 General issues: all looks good
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

@tpaviot
Copy link
Owner

tpaviot commented Nov 14, 2024

@rsm-gh good catch! Deprecation warnings are not raised on my machine, there's something I must have forgot to check/uncheck some option in cmake.

The ShapeTesselator code is quite old, it works but I guess it could benefit from a general cleanup. Please feel free to report any improvement.

@tpaviot tpaviot merged commit 247fbb6 into tpaviot:master Nov 14, 2024
15 checks passed
@rsm-gh
Copy link
Contributor Author

rsm-gh commented Nov 14, 2024

Hello @tpaviot ,

I actually stopped using the Python CAD-Backend in my production server and replaced it by C++, so I can push some code clean up and minor improvements, I just need to check if they are all C++ 11 compatible.

Also I'm investigating some crashes that are coming from the ShapeTesselator & the STEP CAF Reader, so I'll probably push some more useful contributions in the future :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants