Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added preliminary installation and build instructions #16

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 27, 2011

Conversation

QbProg
Copy link
Collaborator

@QbProg QbProg commented May 26, 2011

With my crappy english I've added an initial version of the build instructions for MSVC.
Also, added an initial stub for "usage" of OCE packages in MSVC.

I hope to get this in time for 0.3 , and I'll refine later the whole thing.

@tpaviot
Copy link
Owner

tpaviot commented May 27, 2011

Did you find any location to host precompiled binaries of both OCE0.3/bundle ?

If needed, we can use the download area of the googlecode pythonocc project (http://code.google.com/p/pythonocc/downloads/list). I can also create a oce subdomain to the pythonocc.org website (http://oce.pythonocc.org), but I would prefer the first solution, better in terms of reliability and available bandwith.

@QbProg
Copy link
Collaborator Author

QbProg commented May 27, 2011

I can also create a specific project in google-code, like oce-packages

Yesterday I tryed to open a sourceforge account, but I stopped since
the terms required an OSI-approved license.

2011/5/27 tpaviot
[email protected]:

Did you find any location to host precompiled binaries of both OCE0.3/bundle ?

If needed, we can use the download area of the googlecode pythonocc project (http://code.google.com/p/pythonocc/downloads/list). I can also create a oce subdomain to the pythonocc.org website (http://oce.pythonocc.org), but I would prefer the first solution, better in terms of reliability and available bandwith.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#16 (comment)

@tpaviot
Copy link
Owner

tpaviot commented May 27, 2011

Absolutely, sf does not allow to host projects under 'exotic' licenses, and neither googlecode. Moreover, creating a specific sf or googlecode project would mean you're about to move all the project from github to sf/googlecode.

Maybe there's a way to add the binary files to the github repository and make them downloadable?

@dbarbier
Copy link
Collaborator

+1 for this merge request.
IMO we can write documentation directly into master to save time.

@tpaviot
Copy link
Owner

tpaviot commented May 27, 2011

+1

@QbProg
Copy link
Collaborator Author

QbProg commented May 27, 2011

Surely we could add binaries to gitbub, in a dedicated repository. But then...
each time we pull we will have to download all the packages? :)

I could not find any project hosting that accepts binary-only packages.
What about using a host like http://www.mediafire.com/ ?

2011/5/27 tpaviot
[email protected]:

+1

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#16 (comment)

QbProg added a commit that referenced this pull request May 27, 2011
Added preliminary installation and build instructions
@QbProg QbProg merged commit c8f275b into master May 27, 2011
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants