resource_group_client: add defined errors

[CabinfeverB]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: ref #5851

What is changed and how does it work?

add defined error for other pkgs to judge

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test

Release note

None.

[ti-chi-bot]

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

• JmPotato
• lhy1024

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

[nolouch]

better use throttled.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 74.81% // Head: 74.78% // Decreases project coverage by -0.04% ⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (9b140d9) compared to base (723fd74).
Patch coverage: 22.22% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

❗ Current head 9b140d9 differs from pull request most recent head 3c61048. Consider uploading reports for the commit 3c61048 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #6033      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   74.81%   74.78%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         365      365              
  Lines       36552    36552              
==========================================
- Hits        27348    27335      -13     
- Misses       6808     6819      +11     
- Partials     2396     2398       +2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	74.78% <22.22%> (-0.04%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
client/resource_group/controller/controller.go	61.61% <0.00%> (ø)
client/resource_manager_client.go	66.84% <25.00%> (ø)
client/resource_group/controller/limiter.go	67.50% <100.00%> (ø)
pkg/dashboard/keyvisual/input/core.go	0.00% <0.00%> (-33.34%)	⬇️
pkg/tso/local_allocator.go	62.16% <0.00%> (-16.22%)	⬇️
pkg/member/member.go	60.00% <0.00%> (-5.79%)	⬇️
pkg/dashboard/adapter/manager.go	74.71% <0.00%> (-4.60%)	⬇️
pkg/election/leadership.go	76.28% <0.00%> (-4.13%)	⬇️
pkg/tso/tso.go	65.73% <0.00%> (-3.94%)	⬇️
server/schedulers/shuffle_hot_region.go	56.66% <0.00%> (-3.34%)	⬇️
... and 20 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[JmPotato]

Suggested change

	ErrClientResourceGroupThrottled = errors.Normalize("exceed resource group quota limitation", errors.RFCCodeText("PD:client:ErrClientResourceGroupThrottled"))
	ErrClientResourceGroupThrottled = errors.Normalize("exceeded resource group quota limitation", errors.RFCCodeText("PD:client:ErrClientResourceGroupThrottled"))

[JmPotato]

/merge

[ti-chi-bot]

@JmPotato: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests:

/run-all-tests

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

[ti-chi-bot]

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 9fc2228

[ti-chi-bot]

@CabinfeverB: Your PR was out of date, I have automatically updated it for you.

If the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.