-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 162
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor: Create single utility type to encapsulate color argument #107
refactor: Create single utility type to encapsulate color argument #107
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks good to me @Methuselah96 it would be good to get your opinion too 👍🏼
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me. CapsulatedColor
probably isn't my preferred term because "capsulated" makes me think there's a value "capsulated" inside an object instead of a union, but I can't think of any obviously better names at the moment.
|
Yeah, either of those work for me. Maybe |
I prefer |
OK, changed. Please check out! : 7aca3fb |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🎉
Why
What
Fix: #29
Checklist