bybit: support categorised channel

[junnplus]

PR Description

Enhance Bybit private channel subscription with categorised topics

ref: https://bybit-exchange.github.io/docs/v5/websocket/private/position

Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant and add an x in [] as item is complete.

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• This change requires a documentation update

How has this been tested

go test ./exchanges/bybit -v -run TestGenerateSubscriptions

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration and
also consider improving test coverage whilst working on a certain feature or package.

• go test ./... -race
• golangci-lint run
• Test X

Checklist

• My code follows the style guidelines of this project
• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation and regenerated documentation via the documentation tool
• My changes generate no new warnings
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• New and existing unit tests pass locally and on Github Actions with my changes
• Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

[shazbert]

Thanks heaps @junnplus. Looks good to me! I don't have any funds so incoming changes did not test.

{"req_id":"108432952","success":true,"ret_msg":"","op":"subscribe","conn_id":"cthsbl8f2tdpsfl4bdgg-1hkjbt"}

With payload:

{auth:true RequestID:108432952 Operation:subscribe Arguments:[execution.spot order.spot wallet]

Master outbound which didn't have the specific categorised topic in args:

{auth:true RequestID:122744171 Operation:subscribe Arguments:[execution order wallet]

[shazbert]

NOTE: This is associated with linear/inverse/options and can be removed

[gloriousCode]

That was going to be my first question 😄

[gbjk]

Good work and useful contribution 🎉

One minor suggestion, but approved as is as well.

[gloriousCode]

tACK! Thanks for your contribution!

[thrasher-]

Thank you @junnplus for your contributions!