Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added the DepreciationWarning for the custom op version of activations functions #1791

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 10, 2020
Merged

Added the DepreciationWarning for the custom op version of activations functions #1791

merged 3 commits into from
May 10, 2020

Conversation

gabrieldemarmiesse
Copy link
Member

Step 1 of #1775

@gabrieldemarmiesse gabrieldemarmiesse added the backport r0.9 Will backport any PR merged with this label to the r0.9 branch label May 7, 2020
@bot-of-gabrieldemarmiesse

@fsx950223 @AakashKumarNain @digantamisra98

You are owners of some files modified in this pull request.
Would you kindly review the changes whenever you have the time to?
Thank you very much.

@bhack
Copy link
Contributor

bhack commented May 7, 2020

Can we have few words in the string so that we advice the user/dev that is a global change for all the activations?
So if you use a specific single activation in your model you will be advised for all early.

@gabrieldemarmiesse
Copy link
Member Author

Sure, why not.

@gabrieldemarmiesse
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for the review!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
activations backport r0.9 Will backport any PR merged with this label to the r0.9 branch cla: yes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants